Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31951 - 31960 of 46086 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 31951 - 31960 of 46086 for paternity test paper work.
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel test. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697 (1984) (“[T]here is no reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63723 - 2011-05-09
assistance of counsel test. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697 (1984) (“[T]here is no reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63723 - 2011-05-09
State v. Cynthia A. Provo
court need to provide it. In Trochinski, the trial court did not give the modified obscenity test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5600 - 2005-03-31
court need to provide it. In Trochinski, the trial court did not give the modified obscenity test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5600 - 2005-03-31
Don A. Patenaude v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
test, he failed as a matter of law to comply with the terms of the insurance policy. [3] Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3499 - 2005-03-31
test, he failed as a matter of law to comply with the terms of the insurance policy. [3] Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3499 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
test but failed to satisfy the fifth. We agree. ¶11 With regard to the suppression issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913352 - 2025-02-11
test but failed to satisfy the fifth. We agree. ¶11 With regard to the suppression issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913352 - 2025-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶12 The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test that asks what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54981 - 2010-09-29
. ¶12 The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test that asks what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54981 - 2010-09-29
[PDF]
State v. Ray Lee Wimer
Wimer fails both these tests. Wimer does not point to any evidence that the jury was precluded from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4416 - 2017-09-19
Wimer fails both these tests. Wimer does not point to any evidence that the jury was precluded from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4416 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by Lumpkin, rather than a sale, as charged. ¶11 The test for deficient performance is an objective one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214264 - 2018-06-14
by Lumpkin, rather than a sale, as charged. ¶11 The test for deficient performance is an objective one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214264 - 2018-06-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the blood test. On direct appeal, appellate counsel filed a no-merit appeal, Cruz filed a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497599 - 2022-03-22
of the blood test. On direct appeal, appellate counsel filed a no-merit appeal, Cruz filed a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497599 - 2022-03-22
[PDF]
State v. Arthur C. List
refusal of chemical testing or use of a motor vehicle while intoxicated or under the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7072 - 2017-09-20
refusal of chemical testing or use of a motor vehicle while intoxicated or under the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7072 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Johnny Lacy, Jr. v. James LaBelle
(quoted source omitted). Under this test, a party bringing an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12496 - 2017-09-21
(quoted source omitted). Under this test, a party bringing an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12496 - 2017-09-21