Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31961 - 31970 of 83513 for case code.
Search results 31961 - 31970 of 83513 for case code.
State v. Latasha J.
the case until September 5, 2002, so that Latasha could speak with her attorney and decide how to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6059 - 2005-03-31
the case until September 5, 2002, so that Latasha could speak with her attorney and decide how to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6059 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gregory A. Gibbs
N.W.2d 115, 116‑17 (1996). None of the six fact-specific situations are applicable to this case.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11153 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 115, 116‑17 (1996). None of the six fact-specific situations are applicable to this case.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11153 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of all of these cases comes into play here, as will be explained. ¶3 Pursuant to a plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141395 - 2017-09-21
of all of these cases comes into play here, as will be explained. ¶3 Pursuant to a plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141395 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. We affirm. ¶2 This case arises from a home invasion by ejected partygoers. James, Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52620 - 2010-07-27
. We affirm. ¶2 This case arises from a home invasion by ejected partygoers. James, Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52620 - 2010-07-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156898 - 2017-09-21
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156898 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
discretion in denying a mistrial, we affirm the judgment. ¶2 Williams was originally charged in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51299 - 2014-09-15
discretion in denying a mistrial, we affirm the judgment. ¶2 Williams was originally charged in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51299 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Paul Peltonen v. Brian Richtig
of the witnesses, reinstated Rittenhouse in the case after previously dismissing her, and used her son's failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14905 - 2017-09-21
of the witnesses, reinstated Rittenhouse in the case after previously dismissing her, and used her son's failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14905 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
the parties in each individual case (the fairness objective).” LaRocque, 139 Wis. 2d at 32-33. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27279 - 2006-11-27
the parties in each individual case (the fairness objective).” LaRocque, 139 Wis. 2d at 32-33. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27279 - 2006-11-27
Brian Torgerson v. Reuben Johnson & Son, Inc.
in this case, Sowles, was similarly responsible for the construction of the steel structure that led directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9813 - 2005-03-31
in this case, Sowles, was similarly responsible for the construction of the steel structure that led directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9813 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to equal protection. We conclude there was a rational basis for the sentence. We affirm. ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52620 - 2014-09-15
to equal protection. We conclude there was a rational basis for the sentence. We affirm. ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52620 - 2014-09-15