Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31961 - 31970 of 68566 for did.
Search results 31961 - 31970 of 68566 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
him to roll down his window, and, when he did, Leranth “noticed a strong smell of marijuana emanating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121174 - 2014-09-08
him to roll down his window, and, when he did, Leranth “noticed a strong smell of marijuana emanating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121174 - 2014-09-08
State v. Shannon C. Krause
to the court’s orders by failing to timely object, and we conclude that it did. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15861 - 2005-03-31
to the court’s orders by failing to timely object, and we conclude that it did. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15861 - 2005-03-31
Taylor Venn v. Rebecca Venn
there, Stephen did not leave the room. She further stated that she never had any reason to believe that Stephen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5316 - 2005-03-31
there, Stephen did not leave the room. She further stated that she never had any reason to believe that Stephen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5316 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
[was] holding open per its own order.” Tratz alleged: [T]he 2 page spread sheet that [Monroe] did produce
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131923 - 2017-09-21
[was] holding open per its own order.” Tratz alleged: [T]he 2 page spread sheet that [Monroe] did produce
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131923 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. We issued an order stating that we did not have jurisdiction over the circuit court’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91738 - 2014-09-15
. We issued an order stating that we did not have jurisdiction over the circuit court’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91738 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert B. Frier
to interview and test Frier. She concluded, with some reservations, that Frier did not meet the criteria
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5377 - 2005-03-31
to interview and test Frier. She concluded, with some reservations, that Frier did not meet the criteria
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5377 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to withdraw his plea. Following a hearing, the circuit court denied his motion. Williams did not appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017623 - 2025-10-01
to withdraw his plea. Following a hearing, the circuit court denied his motion. Williams did not appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017623 - 2025-10-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
on December 29, 2004. Assurance did not file its answer until March 14, 2005, well after its due date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27289 - 2014-09-15
on December 29, 2004. Assurance did not file its answer until March 14, 2005, well after its due date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27289 - 2014-09-15
State v. Victoria L. Stark
; thus, the defendant must show that the circuit court did not consider the primary sentencing factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13784 - 2005-03-31
; thus, the defendant must show that the circuit court did not consider the primary sentencing factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13784 - 2005-03-31
Walworth County v. Edward John Shumak
of the forfeiture. We conclude that the trial court did not err in its interpretation of the statute. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10260 - 2005-03-31
of the forfeiture. We conclude that the trial court did not err in its interpretation of the statute. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10260 - 2005-03-31