Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31961 - 31970 of 73756 for ha.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was not fully tried and justice has miscarried. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86078 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Manor Park Village v. Robin Spoden
defenses failed for lack of evidence. Spoden has appealed the trial court's judgment of eviction but has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9750 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jose G.
be served on the “parent or parents of the child, unless the child's parent has waived the right to notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10894 - 2017-09-20

State v. George F. Savage
must determine whether: (1) a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth amendment has occurred; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2968 - 2005-03-31

Thomas K. Archie v.
amounts he collected on their behalf. Attorney Archie has not petitioned for reinstatement and his license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17155 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donald B.
by proving that the parent … ha[s] never had a substantial parental relationship with the child. (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2328 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Johnny M. Lacy
this constitutional right to a speedy trial has been violated is a question of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3946 - 2017-09-20

Michael Kielblock v. Hytec Manufacturing, Inc.
, but Hytec’s liability has already been established. ¶12 Hytec argues the depreciation award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19868 - 2005-10-10

[PDF] NOTICE
which [has] been offered by the plaintiff at the time it rested its case.” See Beacon Bowl, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33503 - 2014-09-15

Rock County Department of Human Services v. Yolanda M.
has chosen … to surround the CHIPS grounds for involuntary termination with procedural safeguards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2364 - 2005-03-31