Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31961 - 31970 of 69045 for had.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was baseless and that he had no evidence to support his claim. Newson did not provide transcripts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880289 - 2024-11-26

CA Blank Order
it had agreed to recommend.[2] The trial court denied the motion without a hearing. Robertson appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117034 - 2014-07-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Department was called about allegations that Lozornio had sexually assaulted V.R.’s two daughters, seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=414602 - 2021-08-24

[PDF] 2021AP001450 - Response of Citizen Mathematicians and Scientists to Motion to Recuse Justice Protasiewicz
’ approach that justified the map’s adoption” had been “overruled.” Id. at 8. The Wisconsin Legislature
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_020724response.pdf - 2024-02-07

State v. James E. Multaler
could not be determined due to decomposition of the body, had numerous contusions on her head and face
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16406 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the location of a shooting where they found Sheila and her 15-year-old daughter Kathy,1 both of whom had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074361 - 2026-02-11

[PDF] WI APP 41
if the court had authority to address the time limitation rule, the court erred by selecting the wrong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109323 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 47
that there had not been problems with vacation rentals the prior year, but that there had been issues with one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980292 - 2025-09-18

State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
is conditional, not absolute, and that Cardenas-Hernandez had abused the privilege because his actions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11857 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mario Santiago Sanchez
that the defendant had failed to meet his burden, under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), of showing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16897 - 2005-03-31