Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31961 - 31970 of 70363 for his.
Search results 31961 - 31970 of 70363 for his.
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Larry B. Hooker appeals from a postconviction order summarily denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29133 - 2007-05-21
CURIAM. Larry B. Hooker appeals from a postconviction order summarily denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29133 - 2007-05-21
[PDF]
Tony Shaw v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, an inmate at the Waupun Correctional Institution (WCI), appeals a circuit court order which dismissed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12871 - 2017-09-21
, an inmate at the Waupun Correctional Institution (WCI), appeals a circuit court order which dismissed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12871 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher A. Cody
assault and false imprisonment on his guilty pleas and from an order denying his sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15661 - 2005-03-31
assault and false imprisonment on his guilty pleas and from an order denying his sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15661 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as a repeater. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2021-22)1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631927 - 2023-03-15
as a repeater. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2021-22)1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631927 - 2023-03-15
State v. Matthew J. Lazarewicz
the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress which challenged the legality of his arrest. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3252 - 2005-03-31
the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress which challenged the legality of his arrest. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3252 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven G. Loveday
in not granting his motion to suppress evidence.[1] I. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11407 - 2005-03-31
in not granting his motion to suppress evidence.[1] I. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11407 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Winius argues he is entitled to sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74538 - 2014-09-15
, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Winius argues he is entitled to sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74538 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
CURIAM. Christopher Holmes, pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion to reconstruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60262 - 2014-09-15
CURIAM. Christopher Holmes, pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion to reconstruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60262 - 2014-09-15
Washington County v. Richard E. Hupfer
reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle and therefore the Intoxilyzer test results should be suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11665 - 2005-03-31
reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle and therefore the Intoxilyzer test results should be suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11665 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discretion at sentencing. Bohatkiewicz argues in response, among other things, that his plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=604120 - 2023-01-04
discretion at sentencing. Bohatkiewicz argues in response, among other things, that his plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=604120 - 2023-01-04