Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31961 - 31970 of 58509 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS
were decided at a jury trial. ¶3 Sandra presented evidence that she suffered new injuries to her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62364 - 2011-04-04

CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 111 (1995). That reason must be more than the desire to go to trial or belated misgivings
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95627 - 2013-04-22

Kris J. Kavelaris v. MSI Insurance Company
. The trial court denied CGLI’s subrogation claim because Kavelaris would not totally recover his full damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3224 - 2005-03-31

Ekatrina Pratchenko v. Donald Fuller
-appeals the trial court's order, contending that there are no disputed facts as to whether the intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11198 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on the counterclaim warranting a trial. However, we do not conclude the appeal was frivolous. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398993 - 2021-07-27

[PDF] Outagamie County v. Martin J. McGlone
automobile on his property. McGlone assigns three points of error. First, he claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15556 - 2017-09-21

James Munroe v. Patrick D. Braatz
thereunder. We conclude that the trial court correctly ruled that the public interest in disclosing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9679 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
The trial court sentenced him to two concurrent sentences of five years’ initial confinement plus five
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173912 - 2017-09-21

Uni-General Corporation v. Century 21 Great American Homes, Inc.
American Homes, a Maurer-Christensen Corporation.[1] Uni-General argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14049 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Darwin J. Pamanet
concentration, second offense; and (4) operating after suspension. Pamanet contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13605 - 2017-09-21