Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31971 - 31980 of 74519 for public records.

05-01 Amendment to Supreme Court Rules relating to Cost Assessments in the Lawyer Regulation System (Effective 7-1-06)
regarding the assessment of costs. A public hearing on the matter was conducted on November 14, 2005
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24996 - 2006-05-01

[PDF] State v. Larry J. Sprosty
necessary to insure Mr. Sprosty’s treatment and protection of the public and supervision of Mr. Sprosty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13344 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
it is “so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate to the offense committed as to shock public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35637 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Jane M. Crawford v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
clause is void pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 632.32(4)(a) as a matter of law and public policy.1 We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3742 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Mark J. Modory
the engine is as much a threat to himself and the public as one who actually drives while intoxicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10304 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Michael B. Sandy v.
had been appointed by the State Public Defender to represent on an arson charge. Following return
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17022 - 2017-09-21

State v. David A. Lehman
and gravity of the offenses, and the need to protect the public. With respect to Lehman’s character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6474 - 2005-03-31

State v. Larry J. Sprosty
and protection of the public and supervision of Mr. Sprosty. Thereafter, the trial court entered an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13344 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Douglas County v. Steven Leinweber
intoxicants in a motor vehicle on a public highway, contrary to WIS. STAT. §§ 346.63(1)(a), (1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2225 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Riviera Airport, Inc. v. Pierce County
of this unique scenic and recreational asset is in the public interest and will benefit the health and welfare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15904 - 2017-09-21