Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31981 - 31990 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 31981 - 31990 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in denying his suppression motion without a hearing. We conclude that Marsh was not entitled to a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238889 - 2019-04-11
in denying his suppression motion without a hearing. We conclude that Marsh was not entitled to a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238889 - 2019-04-11
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Antoine Nelson appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29858 - 2007-07-30
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Antoine Nelson appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29858 - 2007-07-30
[PDF]
Eunice Cohodas v. Catherine Hodkiewicz
., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Eunice Cohodas appeals an order denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25657 - 2017-09-21
., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Eunice Cohodas appeals an order denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25657 - 2017-09-21
Arlene Clayton-Mallett v. Milwaukee County
dismissing the action and awarding statutory costs. On motions after verdict, Clayton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7725 - 2005-03-31
dismissing the action and awarding statutory costs. On motions after verdict, Clayton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7725 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of another doctor, Dr. Terry A. Zarling, and when it denied his motion for a mistrial. We conclude that even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39950 - 2009-08-25
of another doctor, Dr. Terry A. Zarling, and when it denied his motion for a mistrial. We conclude that even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39950 - 2009-08-25
[PDF]
State v. Andre L. Lee
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. The issues relate to newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6741 - 2017-09-20
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. The issues relate to newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6741 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, arguing that there was no basis for his initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54713 - 2014-09-15
the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, arguing that there was no basis for his initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54713 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ryan Ross
his motion to suppress.[3] Specifically, Ross argues that his “Fourth Amendment rights were violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4079 - 2005-03-31
his motion to suppress.[3] Specifically, Ross argues that his “Fourth Amendment rights were violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4079 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of possession with intent to deliver THC. He contends that the circuit court wrongly denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111385 - 2014-05-06
of possession with intent to deliver THC. He contends that the circuit court wrongly denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111385 - 2014-05-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and affirmed Brown’s convictions. Brown later filed a pro se motion for sentence modification, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
and affirmed Brown’s convictions. Brown later filed a pro se motion for sentence modification, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18