Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31981 - 31990 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 31981 - 31990 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
§ 346.67(1)1 and a trial court order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Galvin contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33656 - 2014-09-15
§ 346.67(1)1 and a trial court order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Galvin contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33656 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 76
in 2013 and 2014. ¶7 The parties filed a series of motions following the termination of Michael’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114877 - 2017-09-21
in 2013 and 2014. ¶7 The parties filed a series of motions following the termination of Michael’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114877 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kevin J. McKillion
appeals from the orders denying his postconviction motions. 2 McKillion argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24622 - 2017-09-21
appeals from the orders denying his postconviction motions. 2 McKillion argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24622 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 64
and never filed a motion for leave to file an untimely answer. ¶8 Starion filed a motion to strike
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37061 - 2014-09-15
and never filed a motion for leave to file an untimely answer. ¶8 Starion filed a motion to strike
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37061 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the denial of his postconviction motion.1 On appeal, Balderas contends that: (1) the discovery of a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654489 - 2023-05-09
the denial of his postconviction motion.1 On appeal, Balderas contends that: (1) the discovery of a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654489 - 2023-05-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. at 6. ¶4 Following his direct appeal, Robbins filed a pro se motion seeking a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246958 - 2019-09-17
. Id. at 6. ¶4 Following his direct appeal, Robbins filed a pro se motion seeking a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246958 - 2019-09-17
Kimberly A. Cashin v. William G. Cashin
, as well as the order denying his motion for reconsideration. He contends the judgment of divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6383 - 2005-03-31
, as well as the order denying his motion for reconsideration. He contends the judgment of divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6383 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kimberly A. Cashin v. William G. Cashin
% of his gross income rather than 25% of his salary, as well as the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6383 - 2017-09-19
% of his gross income rather than 25% of his salary, as well as the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6383 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 38
the circuit court erred by denying their postverdict motion to change the jury’s verdict finding them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190480 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court erred by denying their postverdict motion to change the jury’s verdict finding them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190480 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Barnes asserts he is entitled to dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346592 - 2021-03-16
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Barnes asserts he is entitled to dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346592 - 2021-03-16