Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31981 - 31990 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 31981 - 31990 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for sentence modification. The circuit court ruled that Cruz’s challenge to a penalty enhancer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49836 - 2010-05-10
motion for sentence modification. The circuit court ruled that Cruz’s challenge to a penalty enhancer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49836 - 2010-05-10
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert Glickman
When counsel for the defendant filed a motion seeking to prohibit the plaintiff from presenting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17123 - 2017-09-21
When counsel for the defendant filed a motion seeking to prohibit the plaintiff from presenting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17123 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Steven D. Cathey
motion to withdraw his plea. He claims the trial court should have allowed him to withdraw his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15845 - 2017-09-21
motion to withdraw his plea. He claims the trial court should have allowed him to withdraw his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15845 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and affirmed Brown’s convictions. Brown later filed a pro se motion for sentence modification, arguing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
and affirmed Brown’s convictions. Brown later filed a pro se motion for sentence modification, arguing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
CA Blank Order
to pay child support. He also appeals an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103528 - 2013-10-23
to pay child support. He also appeals an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103528 - 2013-10-23
[PDF]
State v. Vernon C. Kukes
to §§ 948.03(3)(b) and 947.01, STATS., and from an order denying his postconviction motion. Kukes raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8668 - 2017-09-19
to §§ 948.03(3)(b) and 947.01, STATS., and from an order denying his postconviction motion. Kukes raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8668 - 2017-09-19
Dorothy Wentland v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
motion for summary judgment. Because we conclude that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8008 - 2005-03-31
motion for summary judgment. Because we conclude that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8008 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maxine Anderson
of her, the circuit court should have granted her motion for a mistrial due to the prosecutor’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3650 - 2005-03-31
of her, the circuit court should have granted her motion for a mistrial due to the prosecutor’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3650 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals from a judgment denying his motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment to David
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144920 - 2017-09-21
appeals from a judgment denying his motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment to David
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144920 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Eric M. Schmitz v. Firstar Bank Milwaukee
, Defendants. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 2003 WI 21 Reported at: 260 Wis. 2d 24, 658 N.W.2d 442
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16535 - 2017-09-21
, Defendants. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 2003 WI 21 Reported at: 260 Wis. 2d 24, 658 N.W.2d 442
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16535 - 2017-09-21