Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31981 - 31990 of 58277 for speedy trial.
Search results 31981 - 31990 of 58277 for speedy trial.
State v. John Tereschko
of this case.[2] The trial court held that it did. This court, however, deems it appropriate to affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3351 - 2005-03-31
of this case.[2] The trial court held that it did. This court, however, deems it appropriate to affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3351 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the counterclaim warranting a trial. However, we do not conclude the appeal was frivolous. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398993 - 2021-07-27
on the counterclaim warranting a trial. However, we do not conclude the appeal was frivolous. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398993 - 2021-07-27
CA Blank Order
of ineffective assistance of trial counsel for what might be characterized as goading the State into filing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97417 - 2013-05-23
of ineffective assistance of trial counsel for what might be characterized as goading the State into filing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97417 - 2013-05-23
COURT OF APPEALS
violations, one for each property.[4] Sherard pled not guilty and a trial was conducted on October 25, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88770 - 2012-10-29
violations, one for each property.[4] Sherard pled not guilty and a trial was conducted on October 25, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88770 - 2012-10-29
State v. Jamerrel Everett
Third, Everett contends that trial court erred by excluding his proffered testimony that another person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14846 - 2005-03-31
Third, Everett contends that trial court erred by excluding his proffered testimony that another person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14846 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jamerrel Everett
. No. 98-3444-CR 3 ¶5 Third, Everett contends that trial court erred by excluding his proffered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14846 - 2017-09-21
. No. 98-3444-CR 3 ¶5 Third, Everett contends that trial court erred by excluding his proffered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14846 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Wisconsin Supreme Court oral argument - April 2023
evaluation, a psychologist deemed Anderson incompetent to stand trial due to mental illness
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsapr2023.pdf - 2023-04-12
evaluation, a psychologist deemed Anderson incompetent to stand trial due to mental illness
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsapr2023.pdf - 2023-04-12
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - November 2008
the conviction and the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress. The Court of Appeals concluded
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34389 - 2014-09-15
the conviction and the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress. The Court of Appeals concluded
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34389 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - November 2022
trial, the forensic investigator testified about the August 4 videotaped interview of SJS and played
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586057 - 2022-10-31
trial, the forensic investigator testified about the August 4 videotaped interview of SJS and played
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586057 - 2022-10-31
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - April 2023
evaluation, a psychologist deemed Anderson incompetent to stand trial due to mental illness
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644922 - 2023-04-11
evaluation, a psychologist deemed Anderson incompetent to stand trial due to mental illness
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644922 - 2023-04-11