Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31981 - 31990 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 31981 - 31990 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his pleas because his trial attorney did not know he had been previously convicted of an alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91837 - 2014-09-15
his pleas because his trial attorney did not know he had been previously convicted of an alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91837 - 2014-09-15
State v. John H. Ellinger
not constitute probable cause to support an arrest for OWI. ¶8 In a terse bench ruling, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7613 - 2005-03-31
not constitute probable cause to support an arrest for OWI. ¶8 In a terse bench ruling, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7613 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kemmick D. Holmes
from a judgment of conviction and an order denying him postconviction relief. He claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15633 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment of conviction and an order denying him postconviction relief. He claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15633 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Uni-General Corporation v. Century 21 Great American Homes, Inc.
that the trial court erroneously applied the doctrines of issue preclusion and laches to bar its action on its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14049 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court erroneously applied the doctrines of issue preclusion and laches to bar its action on its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14049 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
violations, one for each property.[4] Sherard pled not guilty and a trial was conducted on October 25, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88770 - 2012-10-29
violations, one for each property.[4] Sherard pled not guilty and a trial was conducted on October 25, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88770 - 2012-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS
violated the law—hardly an innocent act. Oetzman also claims that, at a trial to determine whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50773 - 2010-06-08
violated the law—hardly an innocent act. Oetzman also claims that, at a trial to determine whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50773 - 2010-06-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and resulted from the trial court’s improper focus on stale and “confused” facts and that the ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181792 - 2017-09-21
and resulted from the trial court’s improper focus on stale and “confused” facts and that the ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181792 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
which were granted by the trial court. This appeal renews the Kamaras’ failed argument that M&I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72331 - 2014-09-15
which were granted by the trial court. This appeal renews the Kamaras’ failed argument that M&I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72331 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Richard Seider v. Connie O'Connell
than on an incidental basis.” WIS. ADM. CODE § INS 4.01(2)(e).2 The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13953 - 2014-09-15
than on an incidental basis.” WIS. ADM. CODE § INS 4.01(2)(e).2 The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13953 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
value. The existence of the recording was revealed during the victim’s trial testimony. Ware sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47193 - 2014-09-15
value. The existence of the recording was revealed during the victim’s trial testimony. Ware sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47193 - 2014-09-15