Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 321 - 330 of 948 for fla.
Search results 321 - 330 of 948 for fla.
[PDF]
WI APP 85
was reasonable at its inception. See, e.g., J.D. v. State, 920 So.2d 117, 122 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006) (holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36455 - 2014-09-15
was reasonable at its inception. See, e.g., J.D. v. State, 920 So.2d 117, 122 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006) (holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36455 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 268
. 2d 369, 371-72 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004); People v. Hayden, 788 N.E.2d 106, 113- 14 (Ill. App. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30936 - 2014-09-15
. 2d 369, 371-72 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004); People v. Hayden, 788 N.E.2d 106, 113- 14 (Ill. App. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30936 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992) (defendant’s two profane statements, separated in time only long enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87972 - 2014-09-15
(Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992) (defendant’s two profane statements, separated in time only long enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87972 - 2014-09-15
Kaloti Enterprises, Inc. v. Kellogg Sales Company
, 75 Fla. B.J., Apr. 2001, at 22, 26. An exception to the economic loss doctrine for a Huron Tool-type
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1242 - 2004-05-11
, 75 Fla. B.J., Apr. 2001, at 22, 26. An exception to the economic loss doctrine for a Huron Tool-type
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1242 - 2004-05-11
Badger III Limited Partnership v. Howard
brokers to “`sublet'” their licenses, see Previews, Inc. v. Murff, 502 So.2d 1317, 1318 (Fla. Dist. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8289 - 2005-03-31
brokers to “`sublet'” their licenses, see Previews, Inc. v. Murff, 502 So.2d 1317, 1318 (Fla. Dist. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8289 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dion Matthews
); Chavez v. State, 832 So. 2d 730, 749 (Fla. 2002) (fifty-four hours of repeated interrogation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4636 - 2017-09-19
); Chavez v. State, 832 So. 2d 730, 749 (Fla. 2002) (fifty-four hours of repeated interrogation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4636 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph K. Bryant
); State v. Foster, 562 So. 2d 808, 809 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990) (“the routine gathering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2377 - 2017-09-19
); State v. Foster, 562 So. 2d 808, 809 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990) (“the routine gathering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2377 - 2017-09-19
State v. David E. Verhagen
); Carter v. State, 382 So.2d 871, 872 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980) (juvenile defendant treated as an adult
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8205 - 2014-09-22
); Carter v. State, 382 So.2d 871, 872 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980) (juvenile defendant treated as an adult
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8205 - 2014-09-22
Brakebush Brothers, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
such as excessive absenteeism.” Johnston v. Super Food Services, 461 So.2d 169, 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984). ¶30
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17059 - 2013-03-18
such as excessive absenteeism.” Johnston v. Super Food Services, 461 So.2d 169, 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984). ¶30
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17059 - 2013-03-18
State v. John E. Olson
Testimony: Admissible Evidence, Pedagogical Device, or Violation of the Federal Rules of Evidence, 24 Fla
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11160 - 2005-03-31
Testimony: Admissible Evidence, Pedagogical Device, or Violation of the Federal Rules of Evidence, 24 Fla
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11160 - 2005-03-31