Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 321 - 330 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 321 - 330 of 74898 for public records.
Kraemer Brothers, Inc. v. Dane County
not public records because they were neither in the custody of a person employed by Dane County or required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14692 - 2005-07-06
not public records because they were neither in the custody of a person employed by Dane County or required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14692 - 2005-07-06
[PDF]
WI App 80
that this is not “an exceptional case” in which the public’s strong interest in the disclosure of government records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=439895 - 2021-12-09
that this is not “an exceptional case” in which the public’s strong interest in the disclosure of government records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=439895 - 2021-12-09
[PDF]
WI 53
and CD pursuant to Wisconsin's Open Records Law, Wis. Stat. §§ 19.31-19.39, after a public hearing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29079 - 2014-09-15
and CD pursuant to Wisconsin's Open Records Law, Wis. Stat. §§ 19.31-19.39, after a public hearing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29079 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
and CD pursuant to Wisconsin's Open Records Law, Wis. Stat. §§ 19.31-19.39, after a public hearing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29079 - 2007-05-14
and CD pursuant to Wisconsin's Open Records Law, Wis. Stat. §§ 19.31-19.39, after a public hearing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29079 - 2007-05-14
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2007AP2584 Cir. Ct. No. 2007CV26
and determination. ISSUES 1. Is a transcript of a closed arbitration proceeding a public record under
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34696 - 2014-09-15
and determination. ISSUES 1. Is a transcript of a closed arbitration proceeding a public record under
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34696 - 2014-09-15
J. Marshall Osborn v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
are not in dispute. In 1998 and 1999, Osborn requested public records from the University in order to analyze
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16432 - 2005-03-31
are not in dispute. In 1998 and 1999, Osborn requested public records from the University in order to analyze
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16432 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
concluded that the District Attorney violated Wisconsin’s public records law, WIS. STAT. §§ 19.31-19.37
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965675 - 2025-06-10
concluded that the District Attorney violated Wisconsin’s public records law, WIS. STAT. §§ 19.31-19.37
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965675 - 2025-06-10
Frontsheet
corporation" which is subject to Wisconsin's open meetings and public records laws. In addressing the question
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33386 - 2008-07-10
corporation" which is subject to Wisconsin's open meetings and public records laws. In addressing the question
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33386 - 2008-07-10
[PDF]
WI APP 63
to Moustakis in response to a public records request. 1 We conclude that various provisions of Wisconsin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145496 - 2017-09-21
to Moustakis in response to a public records request. 1 We conclude that various provisions of Wisconsin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145496 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI APP 238
communications from Dane County officials under the public records law. He asserts that, prior to the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30649 - 2007-11-27
communications from Dane County officials under the public records law. He asserts that, prior to the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30649 - 2007-11-27