Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 321 - 330 of 58381 for speedy trial.

[PDF] WI APP 80
violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial; (3) counts one and two are multiplicitous; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96270 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) there was insufficient evidence to commit him under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28157 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
that: (1) his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) there was insufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28157 - 2007-02-20

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
on appeal the claim for violation of his right to a speedy trial constituted sufficient reason to allow him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27034 - 2006-11-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
have been dismissed due to a violation of his speedy trial rights. Second, he claimed that the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627174 - 2023-02-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
with the circuit court. She asserts that she filed a pro se speedy trial demand in June 2022, but no such demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984145 - 2025-07-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
with the circuit court. She asserts that she filed a pro se speedy trial demand in June 2022, but no such demand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984145 - 2025-07-17

[PDF] State v. Lawrence Northern
their speedy trial rights. Following a conference with their attorneys, the defendants, including Northern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6107 - 2017-09-19

State v. Lawrence Northern
trial date until March if the defendants were willing to waive their speedy trial rights. Following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6107 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not object to the adjournment, as long as the trial could be rescheduled within the remaining speedy trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209914 - 2018-03-15