Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 321 - 330 of 58338 for speedy trial.
Search results 321 - 330 of 58338 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
that: (1) his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) there was insufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28157 - 2007-02-20
that: (1) his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) there was insufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28157 - 2007-02-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
have been dismissed due to a violation of his speedy trial rights. Second, he claimed that the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627174 - 2023-02-28
have been dismissed due to a violation of his speedy trial rights. Second, he claimed that the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627174 - 2023-02-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
on appeal the claim for violation of his right to a speedy trial constituted sufficient reason to allow him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27034 - 2006-11-06
on appeal the claim for violation of his right to a speedy trial constituted sufficient reason to allow him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27034 - 2006-11-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the circuit court. She asserts that she filed a pro se speedy trial demand in June 2022, but no such demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984145 - 2025-07-17
with the circuit court. She asserts that she filed a pro se speedy trial demand in June 2022, but no such demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984145 - 2025-07-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the circuit court. She asserts that she filed a pro se speedy trial demand in June 2022, but no such demand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984145 - 2025-07-17
with the circuit court. She asserts that she filed a pro se speedy trial demand in June 2022, but no such demand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984145 - 2025-07-17
State v. Lawrence Northern
trial date until March if the defendants were willing to waive their speedy trial rights. Following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6107 - 2005-03-31
trial date until March if the defendants were willing to waive their speedy trial rights. Following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6107 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence Northern
their speedy trial rights. Following a conference with their attorneys, the defendants, including Northern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6107 - 2017-09-19
their speedy trial rights. Following a conference with their attorneys, the defendants, including Northern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6107 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not object to the adjournment, as long as the trial could be rescheduled within the remaining speedy trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209914 - 2018-03-15
not object to the adjournment, as long as the trial could be rescheduled within the remaining speedy trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209914 - 2018-03-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Kazanjian
constitutional rights to a speedy trial and due process; and, in the alternative, (3) he should be allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15484 - 2017-09-21
constitutional rights to a speedy trial and due process; and, in the alternative, (3) he should be allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15484 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Kazanjian
constitutional rights to a speedy trial and due process; and, in the alternative, (3) he should be allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15483 - 2017-09-21
constitutional rights to a speedy trial and due process; and, in the alternative, (3) he should be allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15483 - 2017-09-21