Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3201 - 3210 of 45165 for Cost-effective.

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. Backes
of fee refunds to two clients. The referee recommended further that Attorney Backes pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18294 - 2005-05-24

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. Backes
that Attorney Backes pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding. ¶6 Attorney Backes contends
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18294 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Cynthia J. Danielson v. Steven G. Danielson
The record reflects that the parties divorced effective December 17, 1997, although the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6738 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 73
that both communities continue to receive the same level of services in the most cost effective manner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146970 - 2017-09-21

Cynthia J. Danielson v. Steven G. Danielson
condition may affect the way she presents herself at a job interview, thereby having a limiting effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6738 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas D. Baehr
or the prosecution of the complaint. No. 01-1959-D 3 law license effective March 20, 2000
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16529 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 112
in compensatory damages plus interest, taxable statutory costs, and attorney fees and costs under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52096 - 2014-09-15

WI APP 32 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2573 Complete Title of...
without prejudice or costs to either party, subject to and in accordance with the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92717 - 2013-03-26

[PDF] NOTICE
over $85,000 in costs and attorney’s fees following the dismissal of a defamation lawsuit Donohoo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29182 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
. in the amount of $12,189, and that he be assessed the costs of this proceeding. ¶2 After reviewing the record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29091 - 2007-05-16