Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3201 - 3210 of 95299 for Shawano County Case Search.
Search results 3201 - 3210 of 95299 for Shawano County Case Search.
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from judgments of the circuit court for Sheboygan County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116711 - 2014-07-15
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from judgments of the circuit court for Sheboygan County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116711 - 2014-07-15
[PDF]
State v. Bobby C. Felicelli
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: MICHAEL S. FISHER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14415 - 2014-09-15
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: MICHAEL S. FISHER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14415 - 2014-09-15
State v. Bobby C. Felicelli
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: michael S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14415 - 2005-03-31
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: michael S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14415 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven G. Loveday
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: KITTY K. BRENNAN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11407 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: KITTY K. BRENNAN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11407 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
against unreasonable searches and seizures. The main question in this case is whether the exclusionary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52200 - 2010-07-14
against unreasonable searches and seizures. The main question in this case is whether the exclusionary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52200 - 2010-07-14
[PDF]
WI 84
the search the officers conducted in this case was done in accordance with the law as declared at the time
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52200 - 2014-09-15
the search the officers conducted in this case was done in accordance with the law as declared at the time
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52200 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ahmad Abdullah
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JEFFREY A. KREMERS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11544 - 2017-09-19
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JEFFREY A. KREMERS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11544 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ahmad Abdullah
search of his home. We affirm. On the night of January 2, 1996, Milwaukee County police officers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11544 - 2005-03-31
search of his home. We affirm. On the night of January 2, 1996, Milwaukee County police officers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11544 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the protective search was unlawful under Kyles. The Kyles court held that the protective search in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81800 - 2012-05-01
that the protective search was unlawful under Kyles. The Kyles court held that the protective search in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81800 - 2012-05-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the protective search in that case was invalid because the officer did not have reasonable suspicion under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81800 - 2014-09-15
that the protective search in that case was invalid because the officer did not have reasonable suspicion under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81800 - 2014-09-15