Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3201 - 3210 of 29942 for des.

[PDF] State v. Davinne G. Taylor
, and, if so, whether it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo. Sanchez, 201 Wis. 2d at 236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3872 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Steven R. Stein v. State of Wisconsin Psychology Examining Board
pursuant to WIS. STAT. ch. 227 and the circuit court affirmed. The court reviewed de novo the Board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5761 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Rhonda Spaulding
. As a result, the question becomes one that we review de novo. (Citations omitted.) Thus, we decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3260 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
commissioner denied the parties’ motions. John and Lori requested de novo review of the family court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213621 - 2018-05-31

Milwaukee Precision Casting, Inc. v. Mark E. Hagedorn
to MPC’s cross-appeal, we decide the issues de novo and determine that prejudgment interest was unavailable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11245 - 2009-01-20

State v. Timothy M. Ziebart
subject to de novo review. Id. at 639. ¶17 Whether trial counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6312 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and health status, his sentence is a de facto life sentence, and he contends that imposing such a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010270 - 2025-09-18

Steven R. Stein v. State of Wisconsin Psychology Examining Board
pursuant to Wis. Stat. ch. 227 and the circuit court affirmed. The court reviewed de novo the Board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5761 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Milwaukee Precision Casting, Inc. v. Mark E. Hagedorn
the issues de novo and determine that prejudgment interest was unavailable under these facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11245 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 162
judgments on the pleadings de novo as well. Helnore v. DNR, 2005 WI App 46, ¶2, 280 Wis. 2d 211, 694
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41727 - 2014-09-15