Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32001 - 32010 of 63788 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 32001 - 32010 of 63788 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Richard L. Bignell
that the test results are admissible and therefore affirms the order denying Bignell’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2407 - 2017-09-19
that the test results are admissible and therefore affirms the order denying Bignell’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2407 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, arguing that there was no basis for his initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54713 - 2014-09-15
the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, arguing that there was no basis for his initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54713 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ryan Ross
his motion to suppress.[3] Specifically, Ross argues that his “Fourth Amendment rights were violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4079 - 2005-03-31
his motion to suppress.[3] Specifically, Ross argues that his “Fourth Amendment rights were violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4079 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
count. ¶4 Delaruelle retained new counsel and filed a motion challenging the effectiveness of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28512 - 2014-09-15
count. ¶4 Delaruelle retained new counsel and filed a motion challenging the effectiveness of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28512 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for operating while intoxicated, second offense. Tonnancour claims the trial court erred by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28840 - 2007-04-30
for operating while intoxicated, second offense. Tonnancour claims the trial court erred by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28840 - 2007-04-30
COURT OF APPEALS
of possession with intent to deliver THC. He contends that the circuit court wrongly denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111385 - 2014-05-06
of possession with intent to deliver THC. He contends that the circuit court wrongly denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111385 - 2014-05-06
COURT OF APPEALS
and Blanchard, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Lene Cespedes-Torres, pro se, appeals orders denying a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59647 - 2011-02-02
and Blanchard, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Lene Cespedes-Torres, pro se, appeals orders denying a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59647 - 2011-02-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and affirmed Brown’s convictions. Brown later filed a pro se motion for sentence modification, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
and affirmed Brown’s convictions. Brown later filed a pro se motion for sentence modification, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Nos. 2018AP1904-CRNM 2018AP1905-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238511 - 2019-04-10
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Nos. 2018AP1904-CRNM 2018AP1905-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238511 - 2019-04-10
[PDF]
William Frederick Williams v. Rita Llanas (Williams)
, 1997, after Rita missed the court date due to illness. Rita subsequently filed a motion to reopen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13856 - 2014-09-15
, 1997, after Rita missed the court date due to illness. Rita subsequently filed a motion to reopen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13856 - 2014-09-15