Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32001 - 32010 of 83513 for case code.
Search results 32001 - 32010 of 83513 for case code.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197986 - 2017-10-13
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197986 - 2017-10-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955621 - 2025-05-13
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955621 - 2025-05-13
[PDF]
Brian Torgerson v. Reuben Johnson & Son, Inc.
under construction. Id. at 53, 163 N.W.2d at 194. The special employer in this case, Sowles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9813 - 2017-09-19
under construction. Id. at 53, 163 N.W.2d at 194. The special employer in this case, Sowles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9813 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a supplemental no-merit report discussing the plea-taking procedures in this case. Counsel filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218754 - 2018-09-12
a supplemental no-merit report discussing the plea-taking procedures in this case. Counsel filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218754 - 2018-09-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
554, 835 N.W.2d 160. The court repeated language from an earlier case to the effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122448 - 2014-09-25
554, 835 N.W.2d 160. The court repeated language from an earlier case to the effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122448 - 2014-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facts of the case.” State v. Nelson, 146 Wis. 2d 442, 448, 432 N.W.2d 115 (Ct. App. 1988). “We place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192159 - 2017-09-21
facts of the case.” State v. Nelson, 146 Wis. 2d 442, 448, 432 N.W.2d 115 (Ct. App. 1988). “We place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192159 - 2017-09-21
Paul Peltonen v. Brian Richtig
, reinstated Rittenhouse in the case after previously dismissing her, and used her son's failure to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14905 - 2005-03-31
, reinstated Rittenhouse in the case after previously dismissing her, and used her son's failure to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14905 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Conrad L. Aichele and Amanda L. Aichele v. Clark County
examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15973 - 2017-09-21
examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15973 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96238 - 2014-09-15
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96238 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In this divorce case, Randall J. Kuenzi appeals a circuit court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098423 - 2026-04-02
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In this divorce case, Randall J. Kuenzi appeals a circuit court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098423 - 2026-04-02