Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32001 - 32010 of 83320 for case search.
Search results 32001 - 32010 of 83320 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
overhead emergency lights. Indeed, in a recent, factually similar case where an officer pulled behind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36656 - 2009-06-01
overhead emergency lights. Indeed, in a recent, factually similar case where an officer pulled behind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36656 - 2009-06-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or more violations, in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2019CF870. The charge stemmed from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717027 - 2023-10-17
or more violations, in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2019CF870. The charge stemmed from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717027 - 2023-10-17
[PDF]
State v. Abimael Trevino, Jr. - 2022AP000821
or more violations, in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2019CF870. The charge stemmed from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717027 - 2023-10-17
or more violations, in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2019CF870. The charge stemmed from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717027 - 2023-10-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or more violations, in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2019CF870. The charge stemmed from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718645 - 2023-10-23
or more violations, in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2019CF870. The charge stemmed from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718645 - 2023-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS
, 603 N.W.2d 541 (1999). ¶3 There are no material factual disputes in this case. The officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119854 - 2014-08-26
, 603 N.W.2d 541 (1999). ¶3 There are no material factual disputes in this case. The officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119854 - 2014-08-26
[PDF]
State v. Steven C.
permission and this court therefore affirms the order. Facts ¶2 The facts of this case are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5051 - 2017-09-19
permission and this court therefore affirms the order. Facts ¶2 The facts of this case are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5051 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the sentencing transcript in Clark’s escape case. Hill read the court’s comments made by the same judge who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84133 - 2012-07-02
the sentencing transcript in Clark’s escape case. Hill read the court’s comments made by the same judge who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84133 - 2012-07-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence was excessive or that the subsequent resolution of a related civil case against him presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289827 - 2020-09-23
sentence was excessive or that the subsequent resolution of a related civil case against him presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289827 - 2020-09-23
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97319 - 2013-05-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97319 - 2013-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315579 - 2020-12-22
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315579 - 2020-12-22