Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32001 - 32010 of 39844 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 32001 - 32010 of 39844 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motions to suppress statements and evidence and a motion to dismiss as a sanction for the State’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851069 - 2024-09-18
motions to suppress statements and evidence and a motion to dismiss as a sanction for the State’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851069 - 2024-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
between the misleading statements and the refusal. State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis. 2d 871, 873, 876, 569 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28923 - 2007-05-07
between the misleading statements and the refusal. State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis. 2d 871, 873, 876, 569 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28923 - 2007-05-07
State v. Lou Ann Disch
must assume this is a statement that the officer directed Disch to roll down her window, rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5334 - 2005-03-31
must assume this is a statement that the officer directed Disch to roll down her window, rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5334 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cleveland Brown
at times, “he indicated to me he has not heard voices today.” Brown agreed with that statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19345 - 2017-09-21
at times, “he indicated to me he has not heard voices today.” Brown agreed with that statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19345 - 2017-09-21
State v. James R. Bolstad
and a statement from Bolstad. It considered Bolstad's prior criminal record, and noted that Bolstad had a history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8481 - 2005-03-31
and a statement from Bolstad. It considered Bolstad's prior criminal record, and noted that Bolstad had a history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8481 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with her allegedly inconsistent statements made or omitted in prior court proceedings, to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295882 - 2020-10-14
with her allegedly inconsistent statements made or omitted in prior court proceedings, to police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295882 - 2020-10-14
CA Blank Order
the reason for the reduction in the charge: Nelson’s statements were “not the strongest confession
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112455 - 2014-05-12
the reason for the reduction in the charge: Nelson’s statements were “not the strongest confession
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112455 - 2014-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to cross-examine witnesses on “the details of the burglary and Jordan K.’s statements to police.” He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104188 - 2017-09-21
to cross-examine witnesses on “the details of the burglary and Jordan K.’s statements to police.” He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104188 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brian Armstrong
or by statement in open court ... on the record, with the approval of the court and the consent of the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3225 - 2017-09-19
or by statement in open court ... on the record, with the approval of the court and the consent of the state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3225 - 2017-09-19
Chad Boyles v. Milwaukee County
the motion hearing took place. Plaintiff’s counsel’s only statement concerning “additional discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2137 - 2005-03-31
the motion hearing took place. Plaintiff’s counsel’s only statement concerning “additional discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2137 - 2005-03-31