Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32001 - 32010 of 57351 for id.
Search results 32001 - 32010 of 57351 for id.
[PDF]
NOTICE
if defendant makes an inadequate showing on one. Id. at 697. To demonstrate prejudice, “[t]he defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34158 - 2014-09-15
if defendant makes an inadequate showing on one. Id. at 697. To demonstrate prejudice, “[t]he defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34158 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable inferences from basic facts to ultimate facts. Id. at 506. We affirm a jury’s verdict “unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133339 - 2015-01-26
reasonable inferences from basic facts to ultimate facts. Id. at 506. We affirm a jury’s verdict “unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133339 - 2015-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the record, we look “for reasons to sustain a circuit court’s discretionary decision.” Id. “Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054854 - 2025-12-23
the record, we look “for reasons to sustain a circuit court’s discretionary decision.” Id. “Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054854 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
of defending his case.” See id., ¶70 (citation omitted). ¶6 Nelson has not shown that the “Peter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33325 - 2014-09-15
of defending his case.” See id., ¶70 (citation omitted). ¶6 Nelson has not shown that the “Peter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33325 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a demonstratively rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach. Id. ¶13 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142991 - 2017-09-21
a demonstratively rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach. Id. ¶13 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142991 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David H. Hubbard
beyond the record. Id. at 574-76. Here, Hubbard's claim is on direct appeal from convictions where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10600 - 2017-09-20
beyond the record. Id. at 574-76. Here, Hubbard's claim is on direct appeal from convictions where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10600 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Jones
that a violation has occurred[,]” id. at 9, Jones insists that the detectives lacked probable cause to stop him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18740 - 2017-09-21
that a violation has occurred[,]” id. at 9, Jones insists that the detectives lacked probable cause to stop him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18740 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
range of professionally competent assistance.” Id., 466 U.S. at 690. To prove prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120154 - 2014-09-15
range of professionally competent assistance.” Id., 466 U.S. at 690. To prove prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120154 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
.” ¶6 At the end of the hearing, Albert’s trial counsel asked, “[D]id the court say that there’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103044 - 2013-10-14
.” ¶6 At the end of the hearing, Albert’s trial counsel asked, “[D]id the court say that there’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103044 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
case. Id. ¶3 The support objective is fulfilled when the trial court considers the feasibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29493 - 2007-06-26
case. Id. ¶3 The support objective is fulfilled when the trial court considers the feasibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29493 - 2007-06-26