Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32001 - 32010 of 57351 for id.
Search results 32001 - 32010 of 57351 for id.
State v. Woodrow K. Bartlett
de novo. Id. at 137-38. ¶17 A law enforcement officer may lawfully conduct an investigatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3951 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Id. at 137-38. ¶17 A law enforcement officer may lawfully conduct an investigatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3951 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
meaning “is seldom determined in a vacuum.” Id. (citation omitted). We thus interpret statutory
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377016 - 2021-06-16
meaning “is seldom determined in a vacuum.” Id. (citation omitted). We thus interpret statutory
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377016 - 2021-06-16
[PDF]
State v. Brent L. Barber
of the trial.” Id. at 717, 370 N.W.2d at 762. “[T]he decision whether to grant or deny a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11581 - 2017-09-19
of the trial.” Id. at 717, 370 N.W.2d at 762. “[T]he decision whether to grant or deny a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11581 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kycha L.
counsel present his case for him. It addresses nothing else. Id. The supreme court’s holding applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14194 - 2014-09-15
counsel present his case for him. It addresses nothing else. Id. The supreme court’s holding applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14194 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
unless clearly erroneous. Id. ¶13 The determination of the need for protective placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179845 - 2017-09-21
unless clearly erroneous. Id. ¶13 The determination of the need for protective placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179845 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and draws reasonable inferences from basic facts to ultimate facts. Id. at 506. We affirm a jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133339 - 2017-09-21
, and draws reasonable inferences from basic facts to ultimate facts. Id. at 506. We affirm a jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133339 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
exercise of discretion, then we apply constitutional principles to those facts de novo. Id. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181999 - 2017-09-21
exercise of discretion, then we apply constitutional principles to those facts de novo. Id. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181999 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id. (citation omitted). We accord counsel great deference and make every effort to avoid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139102 - 2017-09-21
.” Id. (citation omitted). We accord counsel great deference and make every effort to avoid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139102 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the execution of the agreement.” Id. “[T]he third requirement is also assessed as of the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27296 - 2014-09-15
of the execution of the agreement.” Id. “[T]he third requirement is also assessed as of the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27296 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
temper, and that the caller had personally seen one of the Boggesses’ children limping and bruised. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777292 - 2024-03-20
temper, and that the caller had personally seen one of the Boggesses’ children limping and bruised. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777292 - 2024-03-20