Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32021 - 32030 of 91533 for 1.
Search results 32021 - 32030 of 91533 for 1.
State v. Philip O. Rose
§ 904.04(2), Stats. Those steps are as follows: (1) the evidence must be offered for an acceptable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13525 - 2005-03-31
§ 904.04(2), Stats. Those steps are as follows: (1) the evidence must be offered for an acceptable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13525 - 2005-03-31
State v. Armando Salinas
and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Armando Salinas appeals from the judgments of conviction entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2399 - 2005-03-31
and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Armando Salinas appeals from the judgments of conviction entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2399 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of Supreme Court ATTORNEY disciplinary proceeding. Attorney publicly reprimanded. ¶1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211294 - 2018-04-17
of Supreme Court ATTORNEY disciplinary proceeding. Attorney publicly reprimanded. ¶1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211294 - 2018-04-17
COURT OF APPEALS
: Daniel R. Moeser, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Bridge, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44494 - 2009-12-09
: Daniel R. Moeser, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Bridge, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44494 - 2009-12-09
[PDF]
State v. Kevin W. Mitchell
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Kevin Mitchell appeals a judgment convicting him of failing to report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3195 - 2017-09-19
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Kevin Mitchell appeals a judgment convicting him of failing to report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3195 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William W. Bair
County: BONNIE L. GORDON, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J. William W. Bair appeals, pro se, from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2833 - 2017-09-19
County: BONNIE L. GORDON, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J. William W. Bair appeals, pro se, from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2833 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2019-20).1 We dismiss the appeal as moot
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617372 - 2023-02-02
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2019-20).1 We dismiss the appeal as moot
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617372 - 2023-02-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
).1 We conclude that Shanklin had comparable evidence available to him and, therefore, we affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015124 - 2025-09-25
).1 We conclude that Shanklin had comparable evidence available to him and, therefore, we affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015124 - 2025-09-25
CA Blank Order
filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12)[1] and Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92070 - 2013-01-29
filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12)[1] and Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92070 - 2013-01-29
[PDF]
Randy O'Neill v. James Reemer
and Higginbotham, JJ. No. 2004AP842 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. James Reemer appeals from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17786 - 2017-09-21
and Higginbotham, JJ. No. 2004AP842 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. James Reemer appeals from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17786 - 2017-09-21