Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32021 - 32030 of 83284 for case search.
Search results 32021 - 32030 of 83284 for case search.
[PDF]
NOTICE
presided over Miller’s motions for sentence credit in this case. Due to judicial rotation, the Honorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33273 - 2014-09-15
presided over Miller’s motions for sentence credit in this case. Due to judicial rotation, the Honorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33273 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that further pursuit of the case would lack arguable merit. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2019-20). After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=500487 - 2022-03-29
that further pursuit of the case would lack arguable merit. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2019-20). After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=500487 - 2022-03-29
COURT OF APPEALS
to police that he had “to quit doing this.” ¶8 In the present case, Sergeant Williams found Wagenaar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116153 - 2014-07-02
to police that he had “to quit doing this.” ¶8 In the present case, Sergeant Williams found Wagenaar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116153 - 2014-07-02
[PDF]
State v. Steven C.
permission and this court therefore affirms the order. Facts ¶2 The facts of this case are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5050 - 2017-09-19
permission and this court therefore affirms the order. Facts ¶2 The facts of this case are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5050 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). Background
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142467 - 2015-05-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). Background
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142467 - 2015-05-21
State v. Darrin D. Grosskopf
N.W.2d 659. Ultimately, though, the standard of review is immaterial in this case because we would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6184 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 659. Ultimately, though, the standard of review is immaterial in this case because we would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6184 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was sufficient even if the challenged statements were excised. The case then proceeded to a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207499 - 2018-01-22
was sufficient even if the challenged statements were excised. The case then proceeded to a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207499 - 2018-01-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence was excessive or that the subsequent resolution of a related civil case against him presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289827 - 2020-09-23
sentence was excessive or that the subsequent resolution of a related civil case against him presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289827 - 2020-09-23
COURT OF APPEALS
, C.J. The potential issue in this case is an interesting and novel one. We understand that issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34728 - 2008-12-02
, C.J. The potential issue in this case is an interesting and novel one. We understand that issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34728 - 2008-12-02
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97319 - 2013-05-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97319 - 2013-05-21