Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32021 - 32030 of 83320 for case search.
Search results 32021 - 32030 of 83320 for case search.
Robert N. Ross v. Tommy Martini
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96‑0138
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10248 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96‑0138
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10248 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Indeed, in a recent, factually similar case where an officer pulled behind a just-stopped vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36656 - 2014-09-15
. Indeed, in a recent, factually similar case where an officer pulled behind a just-stopped vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36656 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
property damage. Margaret then filed a motion in a separate case to consolidate that case with this one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91821 - 2014-09-15
property damage. Margaret then filed a motion in a separate case to consolidate that case with this one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91821 - 2014-09-15
Brian L. Read v. Village of Fox Point
. Relying upon established case law, the trial court concluded that the limitation, “for the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8238 - 2005-03-31
. Relying upon established case law, the trial court concluded that the limitation, “for the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8238 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven C.
permission and this court therefore affirms the order. Facts ¶2 The facts of this case are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5050 - 2017-09-19
permission and this court therefore affirms the order. Facts ¶2 The facts of this case are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5050 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). Background
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142467 - 2015-05-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). Background
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142467 - 2015-05-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
presided over Miller’s motions for sentence credit in this case. Due to judicial rotation, the Honorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33273 - 2014-09-15
presided over Miller’s motions for sentence credit in this case. Due to judicial rotation, the Honorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33273 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. At a hearing on December 1, 2022, a court commissioner called the case, noted appearances, and stated: So
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1079617 - 2026-02-18
. At a hearing on December 1, 2022, a court commissioner called the case, noted appearances, and stated: So
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1079617 - 2026-02-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a DNA sample in relation to a prior criminal case. For the reasons discussed below, this issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220257 - 2018-09-28
a DNA sample in relation to a prior criminal case. For the reasons discussed below, this issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220257 - 2018-09-28
Bruce Joseph Croushore v.
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-0437-BA Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17363 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-0437-BA Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17363 - 2005-03-31