Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32021 - 32030 of 97694 for civil court case status online.
Search results 32021 - 32030 of 97694 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 26, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68570 - 2011-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 26, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68570 - 2011-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
. Eskridge, 2002 WI App 158, ¶9, 256 Wis. 2d 314, 647 N.W.2d 434. This case requires the court to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43838 - 2009-11-23
. Eskridge, 2002 WI App 158, ¶9, 256 Wis. 2d 314, 647 N.W.2d 434. This case requires the court to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43838 - 2009-11-23
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 23, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82806 - 2012-05-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 23, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82806 - 2012-05-22
COURT OF APPEALS
at 317. Courts have limited Blum to the scenario where a case was overruled as opposed to reversed. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91376 - 2013-01-09
at 317. Courts have limited Blum to the scenario where a case was overruled as opposed to reversed. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91376 - 2013-01-09
COURT OF APPEALS
246, 267, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). The court in this case conducted a sufficient plea colloquy, thereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98249 - 2013-06-18
246, 267, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). The court in this case conducted a sufficient plea colloquy, thereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98249 - 2013-06-18
COURT OF APPEALS
of a particular case present questions of law which appellate courts decide de novo). ¶7 Richardson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60822 - 2011-03-08
of a particular case present questions of law which appellate courts decide de novo). ¶7 Richardson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60822 - 2011-03-08
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 14, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33744 - 2008-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 14, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33744 - 2008-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 10, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53163 - 2010-08-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 10, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53163 - 2010-08-09
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s determination relative to the license plate, as cases should be decided on the narrowest possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122804 - 2014-09-29
court’s determination relative to the license plate, as cases should be decided on the narrowest possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122804 - 2014-09-29
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case is voluminous; it includes filings made in the trial court, the court of appeals, and the supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102702 - 2013-10-07
in this case is voluminous; it includes filings made in the trial court, the court of appeals, and the supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102702 - 2013-10-07