Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32041 - 32050 of 97658 for civil court case status online.
Search results 32041 - 32050 of 97658 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
qualify as a new factor in this case, the court finds that a sentence modification is not justified under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126712 - 2014-11-11
qualify as a new factor in this case, the court finds that a sentence modification is not justified under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126712 - 2014-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 12, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58602 - 2011-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 12, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58602 - 2011-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case by assuming the truth of disputed facts. Here, the court relied on the revocation summary, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57826 - 2010-12-13
in this case by assuming the truth of disputed facts. Here, the court relied on the revocation summary, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57826 - 2010-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 26, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68570 - 2011-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 26, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68570 - 2011-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 5, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92478 - 2013-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 5, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92478 - 2013-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
to and including the maximum in this case? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. THE COURT: Do you understand that? THE DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40232 - 2009-08-31
to and including the maximum in this case? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. THE COURT: Do you understand that? THE DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40232 - 2009-08-31
COURT OF APPEALS
] Significantly, Williams fails to cite any case in which a court suppressed evidence because it was seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58770 - 2011-01-10
] Significantly, Williams fails to cite any case in which a court suppressed evidence because it was seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58770 - 2011-01-10
[PDF]
Appellate Court COVID-19 order
, or other documents in the following cases pending in the Supreme Court, which are currently scheduled
/news/docs/covid19appellate.pdf - 2020-03-17
, or other documents in the following cases pending in the Supreme Court, which are currently scheduled
/news/docs/covid19appellate.pdf - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
Appellate Court operations COVID-19
, or other documents in the following cases pending in the Supreme Court, which are currently scheduled
/news/docs/covid19coa.pdf - 2020-03-25
, or other documents in the following cases pending in the Supreme Court, which are currently scheduled
/news/docs/covid19coa.pdf - 2020-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 24, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115126 - 2014-06-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 24, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115126 - 2014-06-23