Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32041 - 32050 of 38441 for t's.
Search results 32041 - 32050 of 38441 for t's.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 10, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
., 466 U.S. at 687. Thus, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114116 - 2014-06-09
., 466 U.S. at 687. Thus, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114116 - 2014-06-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
between [Melssen and Y.Z.]” and she saw Melssen punch Y.Z. “through the [truck] window” “[a]t least two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040275 - 2025-11-20
between [Melssen and Y.Z.]” and she saw Melssen punch Y.Z. “through the [truck] window” “[a]t least two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040275 - 2025-11-20
State v. Barry A. Bullard
to the prosecutor’s motion to amend the information. Bullard’s attorney even noted: “[I]t makes sense if we can do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3339 - 2005-03-31
to the prosecutor’s motion to amend the information. Bullard’s attorney even noted: “[I]t makes sense if we can do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3339 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steve B. Tracy
, “this court will refuse to consider such an argument ….” “[I]t is not the duty of this court to sift
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14033 - 2005-03-31
, “this court will refuse to consider such an argument ….” “[I]t is not the duty of this court to sift
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14033 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
be considered sound trial strategy.’” Id. at 689 (citation omitted). Notably here, “[t]he reasonableness
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141953 - 2015-05-13
be considered sound trial strategy.’” Id. at 689 (citation omitted). Notably here, “[t]he reasonableness
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141953 - 2015-05-13
COURT OF APPEALS
that did not fit the testimony. “[T]he choice among competing reasonable inferences is for the [circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52700 - 2010-07-28
that did not fit the testimony. “[T]he choice among competing reasonable inferences is for the [circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52700 - 2010-07-28
State v. James C. Sarlund
. "In reviewing evidentiary issues, `[t]he question on appeal is not whether this court, ruling initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9192 - 2005-03-31
. "In reviewing evidentiary issues, `[t]he question on appeal is not whether this court, ruling initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9192 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(1969), for the proposition that “[i]t can be prejudicial error for a trial judge to fail to instruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75723 - 2011-12-27
(1969), for the proposition that “[i]t can be prejudicial error for a trial judge to fail to instruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75723 - 2011-12-27
State v. Theodore L. Briggs
was submitted on the briefs of Jeffrey T. Jackomino of O'Melia, Schiek & McEldowney, S.C. of Rhinelander
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12087 - 2005-03-31
was submitted on the briefs of Jeffrey T. Jackomino of O'Melia, Schiek & McEldowney, S.C. of Rhinelander
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12087 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
explained: [T]he record’s pretty clear on the deposition that the purpose for Dr. Schnider’s participation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79150 - 2012-03-05
explained: [T]he record’s pretty clear on the deposition that the purpose for Dr. Schnider’s participation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79150 - 2012-03-05