Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32051 - 32060 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 32051 - 32060 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court’s order denying this motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759921 - 2024-02-07
court’s order denying this motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759921 - 2024-02-07
COURT OF APPEALS
). He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing in which he alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108311 - 2014-02-24
). He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing in which he alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108311 - 2014-02-24
[PDF]
State v. Omar S. Polk
also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14766 - 2017-09-21
also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14766 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). In these consolidated appeals, Melvin Ray Tucker, pro se, appeals the order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217332 - 2018-08-03
). In these consolidated appeals, Melvin Ray Tucker, pro se, appeals the order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217332 - 2018-08-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reflects that Oliver’s trial counsel filed a pretrial motion to suppress Oliver’s statements to law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206755 - 2018-01-05
reflects that Oliver’s trial counsel filed a pretrial motion to suppress Oliver’s statements to law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206755 - 2018-01-05
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 346.63(1)(b). Kosky contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40563 - 2009-09-08
. § 346.63(1)(b). Kosky contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40563 - 2009-09-08
State v. David A. Gayhart
presentencing motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 A court may, in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15573 - 2005-03-31
presentencing motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 A court may, in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15573 - 2005-03-31
Arlene Clayton-Mallett v. Milwaukee County
dismissing the action and awarding statutory costs. On motions after verdict, Clayton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7725 - 2005-03-31
dismissing the action and awarding statutory costs. On motions after verdict, Clayton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7725 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Bester also appeals the court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief.1 Bester argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240989 - 2019-05-29
. Bester also appeals the court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief.1 Bester argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240989 - 2019-05-29
[PDF]
Jeffrey Carey v. Michael C. Ablan
. Because we reverse in part, we deny the motion for frivolousness costs. ¶2 The Careys and their two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6691 - 2017-09-20
. Because we reverse in part, we deny the motion for frivolousness costs. ¶2 The Careys and their two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6691 - 2017-09-20