Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32051 - 32060 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 32051 - 32060 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Rutzinski, 2001 WI 22, 241 Wis. 2d 729, 623 N.W.2d 516, the circuit court reasoned: In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66905 - 2011-07-05
. Rutzinski, 2001 WI 22, 241 Wis. 2d 729, 623 N.W.2d 516, the circuit court reasoned: In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66905 - 2011-07-05
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 28, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93425 - 2013-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 28, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93425 - 2013-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. Additionally, later supreme court cases establish that the totality of circumstances test is the correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31409 - 2008-01-08
. Additionally, later supreme court cases establish that the totality of circumstances test is the correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31409 - 2008-01-08
COURT OF APPEALS
months after Colyer’s trial in this case. The court noted that the symptoms and effects of mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101247 - 2013-08-26
months after Colyer’s trial in this case. The court noted that the symptoms and effects of mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101247 - 2013-08-26
COURT OF APPEALS
is that the circuit court lost subject matter jurisdiction over his case when the State asserted during the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35203 - 2009-01-12
is that the circuit court lost subject matter jurisdiction over his case when the State asserted during the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35203 - 2009-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
the case, alleging a speedy trial violation. The trial court denied the motion, granted the adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104346 - 2013-11-19
the case, alleging a speedy trial violation. The trial court denied the motion, granted the adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104346 - 2013-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court denied him due process by “fabricat[ing]” facts, prejudging the case, and exhibiting bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113395 - 2014-06-03
that the circuit court denied him due process by “fabricat[ing]” facts, prejudging the case, and exhibiting bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113395 - 2014-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS
not address all issues raised when deciding case on other grounds). By the Court.—Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99291 - 2013-07-16
not address all issues raised when deciding case on other grounds). By the Court.—Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99291 - 2013-07-16
COURT OF APPEALS
The circuit court discussed the need to protect the public, stating that Kasprzak’s actions in this case “were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72991 - 2011-10-31
The circuit court discussed the need to protect the public, stating that Kasprzak’s actions in this case “were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72991 - 2011-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
help to Angel, whose case must be distinguished due to the lack of a final court order or judgment from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35464 - 2009-02-10
help to Angel, whose case must be distinguished due to the lack of a final court order or judgment from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35464 - 2009-02-10