Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32051 - 32060 of 37037 for f h.

State v. Ronald Frank
the victim and, “[i]f Frank invoked an intoxication defense, he would be admitting the actions but claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17640 - 2005-04-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. Brookwood, LLC, 283 F. Supp. 3d 1153, 1156 n.2 (N.D. Ala. 2017
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=224814 - 2018-10-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2021-22). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815559 - 2024-06-19

[PDF] State v. Daniel Smith
, 527 N.W.2d 343, 349-50 (Ct. App. 1994) (quoting United States v. Green, 882 F.2d 999, 1003 (5th Cir
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10827 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Scott G. Zuniga
: No. 01-2806-CR 3 [I]f your Honor gives him the opportunity to be released on bond with a signature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4503 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, will the presumption of effective assistance of counsel be overcome.” Id. (quoting Gray v. Greer, 800 F.2d 644, 646
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161245 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Christopher K. Engles
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (1997-98). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15813 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jeffrey P. Powers
a known citizen: [I]f “an informant places his [or her] anonymity at risk, a court can consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6879 - 2005-03-31

State v. William E. Draughon III
arguments, and the record. See Resnover v. Pearson, 965 F.2d 1453, 1463 (7th Cir. 1992). It observes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18636 - 2005-07-26

[PDF] Joyce Naomi Hamm v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
rewrites the statute. However, as we have already noted, “[i]f the statute is ambiguous, an agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13497 - 2017-09-21