Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32051 - 32060 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 32051 - 32060 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Ricardo Miramontes-Santos
CURLEY, J.[1] The State of Wisconsin appeals from the trial court’s orders suppressing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5108 - 2005-03-31
CURLEY, J.[1] The State of Wisconsin appeals from the trial court’s orders suppressing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5108 - 2005-03-31
State v. John H. Ellinger
not constitute probable cause to support an arrest for OWI. ¶8 In a terse bench ruling, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7613 - 2005-03-31
not constitute probable cause to support an arrest for OWI. ¶8 In a terse bench ruling, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7613 - 2005-03-31
Uni-General Corporation v. Century 21 Great American Homes, Inc.
American Homes, a Maurer-Christensen Corporation.[1] Uni-General argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14049 - 2005-03-31
American Homes, a Maurer-Christensen Corporation.[1] Uni-General argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14049 - 2005-03-31
Matthew Kulbiski v. Michael DeMarco
that State Farm’s failure to introduce the policy into evidence at trial had any impact on the case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5386 - 2005-03-31
that State Farm’s failure to introduce the policy into evidence at trial had any impact on the case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5386 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kemmick D. Holmes
from a judgment of conviction and an order denying him postconviction relief. He claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15633 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment of conviction and an order denying him postconviction relief. He claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15633 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 112
of their properties. The trial court agreed, but refused to issue an injunction ordering Liebovich to tear down
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28426 - 2007-04-26
of their properties. The trial court agreed, but refused to issue an injunction ordering Liebovich to tear down
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28426 - 2007-04-26
Randall Seltrecht v. Christine A. Bremer
not? We conclude that the answer to this question is “no.” Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11130 - 2005-03-31
not? We conclude that the answer to this question is “no.” Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11130 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Following a jury trial, King was convicted of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43452 - 2009-12-06
and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Following a jury trial, King was convicted of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43452 - 2009-12-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and remand for a new trial. 2 BACKGROUND ¶3 A criminal complaint charged White with one count of theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131832 - 2017-09-21
and remand for a new trial. 2 BACKGROUND ¶3 A criminal complaint charged White with one count of theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131832 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, is unconstitutional both facially and as applied to her and that her trial counsel was prejudicially ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236271 - 2019-03-06
, is unconstitutional both facially and as applied to her and that her trial counsel was prejudicially ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236271 - 2019-03-06