Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32061 - 32070 of 83278 for case search.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is No. 2017AP2283-CR 2 appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231248 - 2018-12-26

COURT OF APPEALS
disagree with Zink that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in this case. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89103 - 2012-11-13

[PDF] State v. Steven C.
permission and this court therefore affirms the order. Facts ¶2 The facts of this case are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5050 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315579 - 2020-12-22

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was sufficient even if the challenged statements were excised. The case then proceeded to a jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207499 - 2018-01-22

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
property damage. Margaret then filed a motion in a separate case to consolidate that case with this one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91821 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
. At a hearing on December 1, 2022, a court commissioner called the case, noted appearances, and stated: So
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1079617 - 2026-02-18

COURT OF APPEALS
of case law applying the statute in various circumstances. We conclude, as did the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33273 - 2008-07-07

2009 WI App 169
2009 WI App 169 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008XX702-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44483 - 2010-03-08

COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Hoover, P.J., Stark and Hruz, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case is before us for the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137721 - 2015-03-16