Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32081 - 32090 of 62227 for child support.
Search results 32081 - 32090 of 62227 for child support.
State v. Carl F. Hickman
of the offense or the nature of his plea; (2) the State withheld exculpatory evidence which would have supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2101 - 2005-03-31
of the offense or the nature of his plea; (2) the State withheld exculpatory evidence which would have supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2101 - 2005-03-31
State v. John W. Page
contends the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s findings on the dangerous weapon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15814 - 2005-03-31
contends the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s findings on the dangerous weapon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15814 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
into juvenile court; (3) there was insufficient evidence to support the attempt charge; and (4) the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52364 - 2014-09-15
into juvenile court; (3) there was insufficient evidence to support the attempt charge; and (4) the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52364 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
apply a bad faith standard and there, as I found before, is nothing in the record to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261526 - 2020-05-21
apply a bad faith standard and there, as I found before, is nothing in the record to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261526 - 2020-05-21
[PDF]
State v. Leonard V. Lauth
was supported by a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity due to the defendant’s leaving the scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11802 - 2017-09-21
was supported by a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity due to the defendant’s leaving the scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11802 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
(2). ¶9 Shorecrest asserts that BoNY’s pleadings fail to allege any facts that would support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36687 - 2009-06-09
(2). ¶9 Shorecrest asserts that BoNY’s pleadings fail to allege any facts that would support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36687 - 2009-06-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a transcript we presume that every fact essential to sustain the circuit court’s decision is supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994986 - 2025-08-13
of a transcript we presume that every fact essential to sustain the circuit court’s decision is supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994986 - 2025-08-13
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Robert Zebro
, our inquiry is: (1) did the trial court make a factual determination supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14549 - 2005-03-31
, our inquiry is: (1) did the trial court make a factual determination supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14549 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Coleman’s and Davis’s proffered testimony would have supported Evans’s claim that he was at home when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30599 - 2014-09-15
Coleman’s and Davis’s proffered testimony would have supported Evans’s claim that he was at home when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30599 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report addresses: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92057 - 2013-01-22
. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report addresses: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92057 - 2013-01-22