Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32091 - 32100 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 32091 - 32100 of 58458 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Fran Ingebritson v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Madison
on the property. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court ruled that the rezoning was illegal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10617 - 2017-09-20
on the property. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court ruled that the rezoning was illegal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10617 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Fran Ingebritson v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Madison
on the property. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court ruled that the rezoning was illegal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9324 - 2017-09-19
on the property. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court ruled that the rezoning was illegal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9324 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. was born in September of 2013, and was nearly five years old at the time of the trial in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258147 - 2020-04-15
. was born in September of 2013, and was nearly five years old at the time of the trial in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258147 - 2020-04-15
Emil E. Jankee v. Clark County
and provided the windows. Jankee contends the trial court erred in ruling, as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9477 - 2005-03-31
and provided the windows. Jankee contends the trial court erred in ruling, as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9477 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
process rights were not violated when the trial court did not request an extension pursuant to § 809.30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72545 - 2014-09-15
process rights were not violated when the trial court did not request an extension pursuant to § 809.30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72545 - 2014-09-15
Fran Ingebritson v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Madison
on the property. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10617 - 2012-06-21
on the property. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10617 - 2012-06-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
eventually moved for summary judgment, and the trial court heard the motion on June 5, 2006. Warren argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28684 - 2014-09-15
eventually moved for summary judgment, and the trial court heard the motion on June 5, 2006. Warren argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28684 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to deprive him of his shares in Arrow Products. ¶9 The trial court granted summary judgment dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30858 - 2007-11-13
to deprive him of his shares in Arrow Products. ¶9 The trial court granted summary judgment dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30858 - 2007-11-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
B.A.G. for the purpose of restoring her to competency so that she may stand trial in two Waukesha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929090 - 2025-03-19
B.A.G. for the purpose of restoring her to competency so that she may stand trial in two Waukesha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929090 - 2025-03-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
relationship” that made the grounds of failure to assume parental responsibility unlawful; (3) trial defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212323 - 2018-05-08
relationship” that made the grounds of failure to assume parental responsibility unlawful; (3) trial defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212323 - 2018-05-08