Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3211 - 3220 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3211 - 3220 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Eric J.D.
he gave to police should have been suppressed because he was “illegally detained,” in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13048 - 2005-03-31
he gave to police should have been suppressed because he was “illegally detained,” in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13048 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eric J.D.
been suppressed because he was “illegally detained,” in custody, and was not advised of his Miranda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13048 - 2017-09-21
been suppressed because he was “illegally detained,” in custody, and was not advised of his Miranda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13048 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kevin B. Johnson
appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15036 - 2005-03-31
appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15036 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 134
145, 699 N.W.2d 110, and Miranda. The juvenile court denied the suppression motion. It found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53555 - 2010-09-28
145, 699 N.W.2d 110, and Miranda. The juvenile court denied the suppression motion. It found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53555 - 2010-09-28
[PDF]
WI APP 134
denied the suppression motion. It found Dionicia’s statements were voluntary and held that failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53555 - 2014-09-15
denied the suppression motion. It found Dionicia’s statements were voluntary and held that failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53555 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tanya M. Luchinski
dismissed. ¶1 ANDERSON, J.[1] Tanya M. Luchinski failed to bring a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15637 - 2005-03-31
dismissed. ¶1 ANDERSON, J.[1] Tanya M. Luchinski failed to bring a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15637 - 2005-03-31
State v. Corie S. Bergeron
motion for sentence credit. Bergeron contends the trial court erred by refusing to apply a thirty-one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14371 - 2005-03-31
motion for sentence credit. Bergeron contends the trial court erred by refusing to apply a thirty-one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14371 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Kohler, pro se, appeals a circuit court order in this criminal case that denied his motion for sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=496030 - 2022-03-17
Kohler, pro se, appeals a circuit court order in this criminal case that denied his motion for sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=496030 - 2022-03-17
[PDF]
State v. Corie S. Bergeron
of conviction for battery and an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence credit. Bergeron
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14371 - 2014-09-15
of conviction for battery and an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence credit. Bergeron
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14371 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
deposited into a joint account he shared with Barbara. Over the course of the marriage, Charles and Barbara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98830 - 2013-07-01
deposited into a joint account he shared with Barbara. Over the course of the marriage, Charles and Barbara
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98830 - 2013-07-01