Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3211 - 3220 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3211 - 3220 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
not have a witness from the state hygiene lab to testify as to the chain of custody. The court recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127635 - 2014-11-10
not have a witness from the state hygiene lab to testify as to the chain of custody. The court recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127635 - 2014-11-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of custody. The court recognized a standing objection and permitted the State to question Adams regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127635 - 2017-09-21
of custody. The court recognized a standing objection and permitted the State to question Adams regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127635 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
seeds. Police took Lenti into custody, during which time she began yelling, “I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999685 - 2025-08-21
seeds. Police took Lenti into custody, during which time she began yelling, “I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999685 - 2025-08-21
[PDF]
WI APP 134
denied the suppression motion. It found Dionicia’s statements were voluntary and held that failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53555 - 2014-09-15
denied the suppression motion. It found Dionicia’s statements were voluntary and held that failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53555 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 134
145, 699 N.W.2d 110, and Miranda. The juvenile court denied the suppression motion. It found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53555 - 2010-09-28
145, 699 N.W.2d 110, and Miranda. The juvenile court denied the suppression motion. It found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53555 - 2010-09-28
State v. Kevin B. Johnson
appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15036 - 2005-03-31
appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15036 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the denial of his motions to amend the complaint and to disqualify the judge. We reject Verdone’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118649 - 2014-07-30
the denial of his motions to amend the complaint and to disqualify the judge. We reject Verdone’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118649 - 2014-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motions to amend the complaint and to disqualify the judge. We reject Verdone’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118649 - 2014-09-15
motions to amend the complaint and to disqualify the judge. We reject Verdone’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118649 - 2014-09-15
State v. Eric J.D.
he gave to police should have been suppressed because he was “illegally detained,” in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13048 - 2005-03-31
he gave to police should have been suppressed because he was “illegally detained,” in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13048 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eric J.D.
been suppressed because he was “illegally detained,” in custody, and was not advised of his Miranda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13048 - 2017-09-21
been suppressed because he was “illegally detained,” in custody, and was not advised of his Miranda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13048 - 2017-09-21