Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3211 - 3220 of 6963 for a u.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Washington, 466 U. S. 668, 687 (1984). If counsel did not give deficient advice, there is no basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67971 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
operating a motor vehicle after having consumed alcohol, but instead prohibits driving “[u]nder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57084 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
argument: [U]sually when I come before a jury to do my closing argument or my summing up, what I tell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28385 - 2007-03-12

[PDF] Adela S. Hagen v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
a shoulder injury: "[U]ntil the schedule is amended, shoulder injuries such as that sustained by appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7774 - 2017-09-19

Timothy J. Winters v. Linda Winters
income” to include salary and wages, investment income, and “[u]ndistributed income of a corporation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17623 - 2005-05-24

State v. Montgomery P. Avant
to challenge the appellate counsel’s performance in a Wis. Stat. § 808.03(1) appeal. Rather, “[u]nder Knight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6224 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
issue for 11 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966). No. 2018AP1800
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320655 - 2021-01-06

[PDF] Gregory Spinner and Marianne Giannis v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment, Inc
3 The Board relies on the definition of “unnecessary hardship” found in the ordinance: “[U
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12766 - 2017-09-21

State v. Yolanda L.
, the application of the U. S. Constitution to those facts is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v. Patricia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5808 - 2005-03-31

2007 WI APP 240
at the time. The court explained that “[u]nder the influence” meant Hubbard’s “ability to operate a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30631 - 2007-11-27