Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3211 - 3220 of 4337 for bd.

COURT OF APPEALS
against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. Peterson v. Natural Res. Bd., 94 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30572 - 2007-10-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
omitted)); Elections Bd. v. Wisconsin Mfrs. & Com., 227 Wis. 2d 650, 654, 669-70, 597 N.W.2d 721 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=498044 - 2022-03-23

[PDF] WI APP 108
pay no deference to its statutory interpretation and consider the issue de novo.6 Milwaukee Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65357 - 2014-09-15

Gary Richard Day v. Ernest O. Hanson
of law, which we review de novo. See Bahr v. State Inv. Bd., 186 Wis.2d 379, 386, 521 N.W.2d 152, 153
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13951 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
County Bd. of Adjustments, 2003 WI App 66, ¶19, 261 Wis. 2d 598, 660 N.W.2d 705; Loy v. Bunderson, 107
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31591 - 2008-01-22

[PDF] Timothy L. Hartwich v. Michelle M. Peterson
the resolution of other issues disposes of the appeal. Labor & Farm Party v. Elections Bd., 117 Wis. 2d 351
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25000 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jeanette Ocasio v. Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital
, which we review de novo. Schmidt v. Wisconsin Employe Trust Funds Bd., 153 Wis. 2d 35, 41, 449 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3249 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Washington Cty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2004 WI 23, ¶13, 269 Wis. 2d 549, 676 N.W.2d 401. ¶22 Moreschi asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244245 - 2019-07-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
person relying on the evidence might make the same decision.” Milwaukee Bd. of Sch. Dirs. v. Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909998 - 2025-02-04

John A. Balcerzak v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
ex rel. Town of Norway Sanitary Dist. No. 1 v. Racine County Drainage Bd. of Comm’rs, 220 Wis. 2d 595
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14599 - 2005-03-31