Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3211 - 3220 of 83447 for case codes/1000.
Search results 3211 - 3220 of 83447 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Assessment ¶11 Pointing to WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DHS 10.44 (through July 2015), the “Standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144509 - 2017-09-21
Assessment ¶11 Pointing to WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DHS 10.44 (through July 2015), the “Standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144509 - 2017-09-21
Daniel Aguilar v. Matthew J. Frank
over some matters. Here, the Wisconsin Administrative Code explicitly provides that “[t]he department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19117 - 2005-07-27
over some matters. Here, the Wisconsin Administrative Code explicitly provides that “[t]he department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19117 - 2005-07-27
[PDF]
Daniel Aguilar v. Matthew J. Frank
Administrative Code explicitly provides that “[t]he department may discipline inmates in its legal custody,” so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19117 - 2017-09-21
Administrative Code explicitly provides that “[t]he department may discipline inmates in its legal custody,” so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19117 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Outagamie County Board of Adjustment
2001 WI 78 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-1046 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17388 - 2017-09-21
2001 WI 78 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-1046 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17388 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Democratic Senator Respondents' Response to Motion to Recuse
FILED 08-29-2023 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 Democratic Senator Respondents
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0822demsenresponse.pdf - 2023-10-16
FILED 08-29-2023 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 Democratic Senator Respondents
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0822demsenresponse.pdf - 2023-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
) under ch. 24, “Wind Energy System Ordinance,” of the 2004 Manitowoc County Code, to build a seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35714 - 2009-03-03
) under ch. 24, “Wind Energy System Ordinance,” of the 2004 Manitowoc County Code, to build a seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35714 - 2009-03-03
William Harris v. Gary R. McCaughtry
satisfied the administrative code or due process, but whether it complied with the circuit court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21407 - 2006-02-15
satisfied the administrative code or due process, but whether it complied with the circuit court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21407 - 2006-02-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Avenue, Beloit. The circuit court concluded that the code violations cited by the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110827 - 2017-09-21
Avenue, Beloit. The circuit court concluded that the code violations cited by the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110827 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
William Harris v. Gary R. McCaughtry
that the administrative code explicitly required such notice at the time, but that the code provision requiring a second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21407 - 2017-09-21
that the administrative code explicitly required such notice at the time, but that the code provision requiring a second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21407 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
concluded that the code violations cited by the City and the assessed value of the property were pretextual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110827 - 2005-08-18
concluded that the code violations cited by the City and the assessed value of the property were pretextual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110827 - 2005-08-18