Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3211 - 3220 of 29722 for des.
Search results 3211 - 3220 of 29722 for des.
[PDF]
WI APP 10
. VAN DE WATER and MARIA S. LAZAR, Judges. Order reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182738 - 2017-09-21
. VAN DE WATER and MARIA S. LAZAR, Judges. Order reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182738 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
review is de novo. The state advocates a “clearly erroneous” standard. We need not resolve this dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87554 - 2012-09-26
review is de novo. The state advocates a “clearly erroneous” standard. We need not resolve this dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87554 - 2012-09-26
[PDF]
State v. Davinne G. Taylor
, and, if so, whether it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo. Sanchez, 201 Wis. 2d at 236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3872 - 2017-09-20
, and, if so, whether it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo. Sanchez, 201 Wis. 2d at 236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3872 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 79
from orders of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER and PATRICK C. HAUGHNEY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83330 - 2014-09-15
from orders of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER and PATRICK C. HAUGHNEY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83330 - 2014-09-15
State v. Rhonda Spaulding
. As a result, the question becomes one that we review de novo. (Citations omitted.) Thus, we decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3260 - 2005-03-31
. As a result, the question becomes one that we review de novo. (Citations omitted.) Thus, we decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3260 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Superior attempts to obtain a de novo standard of review by essentially urging this court to conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301526 - 2020-11-03
Superior attempts to obtain a de novo standard of review by essentially urging this court to conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301526 - 2020-11-03
[PDF]
Steven R. Stein v. State of Wisconsin Psychology Examining Board
pursuant to WIS. STAT. ch. 227 and the circuit court affirmed. The court reviewed de novo the Board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5761 - 2017-09-19
pursuant to WIS. STAT. ch. 227 and the circuit court affirmed. The court reviewed de novo the Board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5761 - 2017-09-19
Steven R. Stein v. State of Wisconsin Psychology Examining Board
pursuant to Wis. Stat. ch. 227 and the circuit court affirmed. The court reviewed de novo the Board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5761 - 2005-03-31
pursuant to Wis. Stat. ch. 227 and the circuit court affirmed. The court reviewed de novo the Board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5761 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id.; see also Voces De La Frontera, Inc. v. Clarke, 2017 WI 16, ¶11, 373 Wis. 2d 348, 891 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725474 - 2023-11-07
.” Id.; see also Voces De La Frontera, Inc. v. Clarke, 2017 WI 16, ¶11, 373 Wis. 2d 348, 891 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725474 - 2023-11-07
Milwaukee Precision Casting, Inc. v. Mark E. Hagedorn
to MPC’s cross-appeal, we decide the issues de novo and determine that prejudgment interest was unavailable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11245 - 2005-03-31
to MPC’s cross-appeal, we decide the issues de novo and determine that prejudgment interest was unavailable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11245 - 2005-03-31