Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3211 - 3220 of 69076 for he.
Search results 3211 - 3220 of 69076 for he.
[PDF]
Jeffrey D. Berlin v. Lori S. Berlin
that Jeffrey did not establish he was entitled to have the support payments reduced. We also conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4627 - 2017-09-19
that Jeffrey did not establish he was entitled to have the support payments reduced. We also conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4627 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
conviction: he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, and the trial court’s refusal to instruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28837 - 2007-06-26
conviction: he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, and the trial court’s refusal to instruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28837 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth E. Neu
the influence of an intoxicant, third offense. He contends that the circuit court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21750 - 2017-09-21
the influence of an intoxicant, third offense. He contends that the circuit court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21750 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brian K. Rice
his sentence for his conviction on one of the counts of burglary. He submits that the postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6423 - 2005-03-31
his sentence for his conviction on one of the counts of burglary. He submits that the postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6423 - 2005-03-31
State v. David J. Arnold
to police. The State argues that (1) Arnold was not in custody when he made the statements, and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3862 - 2005-03-31
to police. The State argues that (1) Arnold was not in custody when he made the statements, and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3862 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David J. Arnold
was not in custody when he made the statements, and (2) Arnold’s statements were voluntary because the police used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3862 - 2017-09-20
was not in custody when he made the statements, and (2) Arnold’s statements were voluntary because the police used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3862 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
that he was on patrol when he received a call that there had been a shooting at a house. When he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34862 - 2014-09-15
that he was on patrol when he received a call that there had been a shooting at a house. When he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34862 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Wood County Department of Social Services v. James W. F.
., and Rebecca L.F. He argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the fact-finding hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7618 - 2017-09-19
., and Rebecca L.F. He argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the fact-finding hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7618 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Wood County Department of Social Services v. James W. F.
., and Rebecca L.F. He argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the fact-finding hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7616 - 2017-09-19
., and Rebecca L.F. He argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the fact-finding hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7616 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Wood County Department of Social Services v. James W. F.
., and Rebecca L.F. He argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the fact-finding hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7617 - 2017-09-19
., and Rebecca L.F. He argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the fact-finding hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7617 - 2017-09-19