Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3211 - 3220 of 26464 for marital settlement agreement/1000.

[PDF] Randy A. J. v. Norma I. J.
to rebut the marital child presumption found in Wis. Stat. § 891.41, that presumption remains intact
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16596 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the marital estate equally, resulting in an award of $12,075,121 each to both Linda and Charles. Resolution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31048 - 2008-02-19

[PDF] WI APP 21
appropriate for equal division of property. The court then divided the marital estate equally, resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31048 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Waukesha County 2018CV002317: Scot Industries, Inc., v. Gexpro Inc., et al.
and conditions of their agreement disclaim the warranties on which the plaintiff bases its claims. The Court
/services/attorney/docs/cdpp_dec2018CV002317.pdf - 2020-06-04

[PDF] Parke O'Flaherty, Ltd. v. Patricia M. Knuth
. The parties entered into a retainer agreement, which included the following provision covering expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5592 - 2017-09-19

Robert J. Ollman v. Scott H. Pecor
agreement for Pecor to rent the Ollmans’s residence on Fairfield Road in Mequon. The lease was for five one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25098 - 2006-05-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in the marital estate. ¶2 We conclude that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840302 - 2024-08-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
estate should claim a particular type of partial marital property deduction on Charles’s federal estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136661 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
should claim a particular type of partial marital property deduction on Charles’s federal estate taxes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136661 - 2015-03-04

Sandra Lynn Modrow v. Kim Jerome Modrow
division, the parties’ primary asset was the equity in the marital residence, which was awarded to Sandra
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2794 - 2005-03-31