Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32101 - 32110 of 37875 for d's.
Search results 32101 - 32110 of 37875 for d's.
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - February 2020
argument based upon the submission of briefs without oral argument: 18AP1176-D Office of Lawyer
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253630 - 2020-02-04
argument based upon the submission of briefs without oral argument: 18AP1176-D Office of Lawyer
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253630 - 2020-02-04
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
Arg. or Brief Subm. CA Dist./ Cty. CA Decision 2024AP1390 Waukesha County v. R. D. T
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040297 - 2025-11-17
Arg. or Brief Subm. CA Dist./ Cty. CA Decision 2024AP1390 Waukesha County v. R. D. T
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040297 - 2025-11-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(d) (2021-22). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754073 - 2024-01-24
of 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(d) (2021-22). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754073 - 2024-01-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence “corroborate[d]” the victim’s statement because “what other men could she have gotten this DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245458 - 2019-08-27
evidence “corroborate[d]” the victim’s statement because “what other men could she have gotten this DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245458 - 2019-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV In re the termination of parental rights to Sydney D-R., a person under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89485 - 2012-11-20
OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV In re the termination of parental rights to Sydney D-R., a person under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89485 - 2012-11-20
State v. Daniel J. Marinko, Sr.
brief are not supported by citations to the record. This violates Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(d) and (e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4904 - 2005-03-31
brief are not supported by citations to the record. This violates Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(d) and (e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4904 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Montgomery P. Avant
was not ineffective for failing to call these two other witnesses. 4 D. Appellate counsel was not ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6224 - 2017-09-19
was not ineffective for failing to call these two other witnesses. 4 D. Appellate counsel was not ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6224 - 2017-09-19
Martin Riddell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
: Michael D. Guolee, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Schudson and Curley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13289 - 2005-03-31
: Michael D. Guolee, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Schudson and Curley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13289 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not substitute our judgment for the Division’s. See id. “If substantial evidence supports the [D]ivision’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211695 - 2018-04-24
not substitute our judgment for the Division’s. See id. “If substantial evidence supports the [D]ivision’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211695 - 2018-04-24
State v. Eric J. Hendrickson
. Wolfe, 2001 WI App 136, ¶37, 246 Wis. 2d 233, 631 N.W.2d 240, we determined that “[d]iagnoses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5230 - 2005-03-31
. Wolfe, 2001 WI App 136, ¶37, 246 Wis. 2d 233, 631 N.W.2d 240, we determined that “[d]iagnoses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5230 - 2005-03-31