Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32111 - 32120 of 63725 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 32111 - 32120 of 63725 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
Sagen appeals the order denying his motion to suppress evidence and the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59077 - 2011-01-19
Sagen appeals the order denying his motion to suppress evidence and the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59077 - 2011-01-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that earlier action. ¶5 All of the defendants filed motions for summary judgment.3 Bach filed one brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75493 - 2014-09-15
that earlier action. ¶5 All of the defendants filed motions for summary judgment.3 Bach filed one brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75493 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that, assuming Wieczorek did not prevail on the seizure issue, there were other motions counsel still needed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101687 - 2013-09-09
that, assuming Wieczorek did not prevail on the seizure issue, there were other motions counsel still needed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101687 - 2013-09-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for DNA testing under WIS. STAT. § 974.07(2) (2019-20).1 After pleading guilty to first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581615 - 2022-10-26
motion for DNA testing under WIS. STAT. § 974.07(2) (2019-20).1 After pleading guilty to first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581615 - 2022-10-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by a felon, as well as an order denying his postconviction motion. See WIS. STAT. §§ 941.29(2) (2007-08
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164951 - 2017-09-21
by a felon, as well as an order denying his postconviction motion. See WIS. STAT. §§ 941.29(2) (2007-08
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164951 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jennifer L. Lyon v. Michael R. Max
a motion to vacate the default judgment pursuant to §§ 806.07(1)(d) and (h), STATS. Max again contended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9939 - 2017-09-19
a motion to vacate the default judgment pursuant to §§ 806.07(1)(d) and (h), STATS. Max again contended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9939 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an answer, Penkalski filed a motion for default judgment, which he mailed to Svoboda. On the day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169343 - 2017-09-21
an answer, Penkalski filed a motion for default judgment, which he mailed to Svoboda. On the day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169343 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Elizabeth Freer v. Michael A. Whitcomb
A. Whitcomb. Whitcomb cross-appeals the denial of his motion to have the action declared frivolous. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20975 - 2017-09-21
A. Whitcomb. Whitcomb cross-appeals the denial of his motion to have the action declared frivolous. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20975 - 2017-09-21
Brenda Moore v. M.J. Kortsch
her for bringing a motion to reopen the dismissal order in the second action. Kortsch seeks appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3064 - 2005-03-31
her for bringing a motion to reopen the dismissal order in the second action. Kortsch seeks appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3064 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and his financial outlay in defending that earlier action. ¶5 All of the defendants filed motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75493 - 2011-12-20
and his financial outlay in defending that earlier action. ¶5 All of the defendants filed motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75493 - 2011-12-20