Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32111 - 32120 of 77742 for j o e ' s.
Search results 32111 - 32120 of 77742 for j o e ' s.
Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
District County Select/view Sep 25, 2025 2024AP001632 State v. Darryl E. Mathews 4 Wood PDF Sep 25, 2025
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=09/25/2025&end_date=09/25/2025¬iceTypeCode=SMD
District County Select/view Sep 25, 2025 2024AP001632 State v. Darryl E. Mathews 4 Wood PDF Sep 25, 2025
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=09/25/2025&end_date=09/25/2025¬iceTypeCode=SMD
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Response of Intervenors-Petitioners Nathan Atkinson et al. to Motion for Reconsideration
, 142 S. Ct. 879, 880–81 (2022) (Kavanaugh, J., concurring); Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U.S. 1, 4–5
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0104intervenors.pdf - 2024-01-05
, 142 S. Ct. 879, 880–81 (2022) (Kavanaugh, J., concurring); Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U.S. 1, 4–5
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0104intervenors.pdf - 2024-01-05
[PDF]
Frontsheet
TITLE: In the Matter of the Bar Admission of David E. Hammer: David E. Hammer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265592 - 2020-06-25
TITLE: In the Matter of the Bar Admission of David E. Hammer: David E. Hammer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265592 - 2020-06-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the bargaining table is to persuade the defendant to forgo his right to plead not guilty.” Id. “[O]penly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213945 - 2018-06-12
at the bargaining table is to persuade the defendant to forgo his right to plead not guilty.” Id. “[O]penly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213945 - 2018-06-12
State v. Robert L. Ward
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7709 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7709 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the dispatch report was harmless. See WIS. STAT. § 901.03(1) (“[e]rror may not be predicated upon a ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=553377 - 2022-08-09
the dispatch report was harmless. See WIS. STAT. § 901.03(1) (“[e]rror may not be predicated upon a ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=553377 - 2022-08-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statement: This is to certify that Chad A[.] Renier was under my care [o]n 11-5-2014 for treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245103 - 2019-08-13
statement: This is to certify that Chad A[.] Renier was under my care [o]n 11-5-2014 for treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245103 - 2019-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS
for appeal purposes and that “[n]o further hearings are contemplated.” Schroeder did not appeal from the May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120146 - 2014-08-25
for appeal purposes and that “[n]o further hearings are contemplated.” Schroeder did not appeal from the May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120146 - 2014-08-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, explicitly stated that it was a final order for appeal purposes and that “[n]o further hearings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120146 - 2014-09-15
, explicitly stated that it was a final order for appeal purposes and that “[n]o further hearings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120146 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Ward
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7709 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7709 - 2017-09-19