Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32121 - 32130 of 65728 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 32121 - 32130 of 65728 for divorce records/1000.
Bank of Luxemburg v. Denis E. Wery
.) We conclude that the record supports the trial court's implicit determination that Wery's physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13576 - 2005-03-31
.) We conclude that the record supports the trial court's implicit determination that Wery's physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13576 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denied Rogstad’s motion to dismiss for reasons stated on the record.[3] The court determined after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144424 - 2015-07-13
denied Rogstad’s motion to dismiss for reasons stated on the record.[3] The court determined after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144424 - 2015-07-13
State v. David Borst
] Because the record thus supports a determination that Borst understood his rights and that Artus would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19310 - 2005-08-16
] Because the record thus supports a determination that Borst understood his rights and that Artus would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19310 - 2005-08-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and that his impairment is permanent. ¶10 The only evidence in the Record as to the two criteria Robert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989236 - 2025-07-30
and that his impairment is permanent. ¶10 The only evidence in the Record as to the two criteria Robert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989236 - 2025-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
: Can I? THE COURT: Sure. (The defendant conferring with attorney off the record.) THE DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73674 - 2011-11-14
: Can I? THE COURT: Sure. (The defendant conferring with attorney off the record.) THE DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73674 - 2011-11-14
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Donald Leiser
is not placing an objection on the record and I’m going to allow the state to elicit that testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20285 - 2017-09-21
is not placing an objection on the record and I’m going to allow the state to elicit that testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20285 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
to file a response but he has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135181 - 2015-02-12
to file a response but he has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135181 - 2015-02-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we modify the judgment 2 and summarily affirm the judgment as modified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149172 - 2017-09-21
and an independent review of the record, we modify the judgment 2 and summarily affirm the judgment as modified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149172 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michelle M.
evidence in the record to support the termination, this court affirms. BACKGROUND ¶2 Paulette G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18236 - 2017-09-21
evidence in the record to support the termination, this court affirms. BACKGROUND ¶2 Paulette G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18236 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980324 - 2025-07-08
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980324 - 2025-07-08