Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32131 - 32140 of 68195 for law.

County of Sheboygan v. Todd A. Hendrikse
, together with rational inferences drawn from those facts, sufficient to lead a reasonable law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6470 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Juniper Estates Compliance Committee Consisting of: v. Jerry Lydon
covenant is a question of law we review independently of the trial court. Zinda v. Krause, 191 Wis.2d 154
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9535 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Douglas Parks
erroneous. Whether a search or seizure passes constitutional muster, however, is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14146 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
without notice at any time and for any reason not prohibited by law. Any representation to the contrary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918948 - 2025-02-26

[PDF] CV-455; Petition for Name Change for Minor Child under 14
be a violation of one of the listed state laws. Specify: In 3, enter the name of the non
/formdisplay/CV-481.pdf?formNumber=CV-481&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2022-11-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
It is constitutionally permissible for a law enforcement officer to briefly detain an individual for investigative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611962 - 2023-01-18

T.J.C., Inc. v. Westerfeld Oil Company, Inc.
it had recently sold. The removal was required under state environmental laws and regulations and also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2729 - 2005-03-31

State v. Bruce A. Kassube
or constitutional muster is a question of law that this court reviews independently. Id. DISCUSSION ΒΆ5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5613 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
or laws of this state, that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123043 - 2014-10-06

Jamie L. McCallum v. Alpha Property & Casualty Insurance Company
the court should have resolved the residency question in Jamie and Zenath's favor as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7923 - 2005-03-31