Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32151 - 32160 of 68967 for had.
Search results 32151 - 32160 of 68967 for had.
State v. Dennis P. Smith
affidavit of indigency in support of his obtaining counsel at county expense. The court found Smith had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19393 - 2005-08-24
affidavit of indigency in support of his obtaining counsel at county expense. The court found Smith had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19393 - 2005-08-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.], at the time of the offense, had not obtained the age of 13. [N.C.B.]’s date of birth is May 23, 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67971 - 2014-09-15
.], at the time of the offense, had not obtained the age of 13. [N.C.B.]’s date of birth is May 23, 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67971 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a citizen informant, who had called to report a possibly intoxicated driver. The informant, a pedestrian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88998 - 2012-11-05
a citizen informant, who had called to report a possibly intoxicated driver. The informant, a pedestrian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88998 - 2012-11-05
[PDF]
Cranberry Springs, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
was an "employe" under § 108.02(12), STATS. If Stanley was not an employee, Cranberry would not have had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9422 - 2017-09-19
was an "employe" under § 108.02(12), STATS. If Stanley was not an employee, Cranberry would not have had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9422 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” The circuit court appeared to respond to this by indicating that it had considered and rejected both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103339 - 2017-09-21
.” The circuit court appeared to respond to this by indicating that it had considered and rejected both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103339 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James Hayett v. Kemper Securities, Inc.
employers. During Hayett’s search for new employment, he discovered that Kemper had filed a U-5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11312 - 2017-09-19
employers. During Hayett’s search for new employment, he discovered that Kemper had filed a U-5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11312 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
at the residence he shared with his longtime girlfriend M.R. At trial, M.R. testified that she had hidden her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122846 - 2014-09-30
at the residence he shared with his longtime girlfriend M.R. At trial, M.R. testified that she had hidden her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122846 - 2014-09-30
[PDF]
Norvin Lewis v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin
was left in Mr. Lewis, and had to be removed in a later surgery. 2 According to the stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14951 - 2017-09-21
was left in Mr. Lewis, and had to be removed in a later surgery. 2 According to the stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14951 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
girlfriend M.R. At trial, M.R. testified that she had hidden her money from Hatton so he would not use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122846 - 2014-10-01
girlfriend M.R. At trial, M.R. testified that she had hidden her money from Hatton so he would not use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122846 - 2014-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
and delivering a controlled substance.[1] He filed a postconviction motion asserting that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39573 - 2009-08-27
and delivering a controlled substance.[1] He filed a postconviction motion asserting that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39573 - 2009-08-27