Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32161 - 32170 of 58277 for speedy trial.
Search results 32161 - 32170 of 58277 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State Public Defender v. Circuit Court for Fond Du Lac County
. An appellate court is not bound by a trial court's conclusions of law and decides the matter de novo. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8248 - 2017-09-19
. An appellate court is not bound by a trial court's conclusions of law and decides the matter de novo. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8248 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the most recent extension of the commitment on June 8, 2015, after a jury trial. At the conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163891 - 2017-09-21
the most recent extension of the commitment on June 8, 2015, after a jury trial. At the conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163891 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to that profile. ¶6 Gajewski was not available at the time of trial, nor was the analyst who did the original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117121 - 2017-09-21
to that profile. ¶6 Gajewski was not available at the time of trial, nor was the analyst who did the original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117121 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
constant income fluctuation reporting and that, if it did, the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36286 - 2014-09-15
constant income fluctuation reporting and that, if it did, the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36286 - 2014-09-15
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
she failed to appear in person at the scheduled jury trial. In addition, she insists that the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3921 - 2005-03-31
she failed to appear in person at the scheduled jury trial. In addition, she insists that the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3921 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
it does not appear that the trial court explicitly addressed John’s alternate theory, we can infer from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54736 - 2010-09-22
it does not appear that the trial court explicitly addressed John’s alternate theory, we can infer from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54736 - 2010-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS
, determination of damages, and denial of a jury trial. We reject Staeheli’s arguments and affirm. We also agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61248 - 2011-03-14
, determination of damages, and denial of a jury trial. We reject Staeheli’s arguments and affirm. We also agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61248 - 2011-03-14
COURT OF APPEALS
that he understood. When the court announced the date of Timothy’s TPR trial, Timothy notified the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69106 - 2011-08-09
that he understood. When the court announced the date of Timothy’s TPR trial, Timothy notified the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69106 - 2011-08-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Before trial, Gutierrez filed a motion to admit extrinsic evidence that T.M.G. had made a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207289 - 2018-01-24
Before trial, Gutierrez filed a motion to admit extrinsic evidence that T.M.G. had made a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207289 - 2018-01-24
State v. Randall McConochie
on July 31, 1998. Upon receipt of the not guilty pleas, a trial was scheduled for October 13, 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2371 - 2005-03-31
on July 31, 1998. Upon receipt of the not guilty pleas, a trial was scheduled for October 13, 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2371 - 2005-03-31