Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32171 - 32180 of 97658 for civil court case status online.
Search results 32171 - 32180 of 97658 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
minimum of six months in this case. And I feel as an officer of the Court, I’m obligated to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36112 - 2009-04-14
minimum of six months in this case. And I feel as an officer of the Court, I’m obligated to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36112 - 2009-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
of the court. The circuit court in this case authorized its use in a postconviction proceeding to aid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92099 - 2013-01-29
of the court. The circuit court in this case authorized its use in a postconviction proceeding to aid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92099 - 2013-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
court did not adequately explain its reasons for imposing consecutive sentences. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33994 - 2008-09-15
court did not adequately explain its reasons for imposing consecutive sentences. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33994 - 2008-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case supports the court’s placement determination. ¶19 Further, this court rejects Carl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93604 - 2013-03-04
in this case supports the court’s placement determination. ¶19 Further, this court rejects Carl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93604 - 2013-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS
. Why a day and a half [to try the case to the court]? I mean, if we waive the jury trial in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34660 - 2008-11-25
. Why a day and a half [to try the case to the court]? I mean, if we waive the jury trial in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34660 - 2008-11-25
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 22, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106959 - 2014-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 22, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106959 - 2014-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 13, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33726 - 2008-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 13, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33726 - 2008-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 27, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71515 - 2011-09-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 27, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71515 - 2011-09-26
COURT OF APPEALS
that is properly before this court at this time. BACKGROUND ¶2 The charges at issue in this case stemmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78232 - 2012-02-21
that is properly before this court at this time. BACKGROUND ¶2 The charges at issue in this case stemmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78232 - 2012-02-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Brown contends that the circuit court “failed to mention any mitigating circumstances in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46217 - 2010-01-25
Brown contends that the circuit court “failed to mention any mitigating circumstances in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46217 - 2010-01-25