Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32171 - 32180 of 45871 for paternity test paper work.

State v. Curtis P. Johnson
, that is sufficient under the Wisconsin test. Id. The bear tag corroborates that a bear was killed with a gun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7409 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Motion for Reconsideration of Scheduling Order by Wisconsin Legislature and Republican Senator Respondents
of fact. Experts must be put to the test of cross-examination. See, e.g., Prosser v. Elections Bd., 793
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012224motionreconsiderationwl.pdf - 2024-01-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
A toxicology report later revealed that Ojeda tested positive for benzodiazepines, opiates, cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817815 - 2024-06-25

[PDF] Richard D. Herr v. Janet M. Herr
of the judgment." The "extraordinary circumstances" test applies and the court must determine whether, in view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9114 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and that officer testimony regarding a positive field test for THC was sufficient to prove the fifth violation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043048 - 2025-11-26

[PDF] Johnny Lacy, Jr. v. James LaBelle
(quoted source omitted). Under this test, a party bringing an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12496 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of marijuana, over $11,000 in cash, a safe that tested positive for the presence of THC, scales, THC
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694036 - 2023-08-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and that officer testimony regarding a positive field test for THC was sufficient to prove the fifth violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043048 - 2025-11-26

State v. Joseph S. Barfoot
.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. However, we need not address the prejudice prong of the test if deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15713 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ray Lee Wimer
App 142, ¶21, 237 Wis. 2d 558, 614 N.W.2d 543. ¶11 Wimer fails both these tests. Wimer does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4416 - 2005-03-31