Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 32181 - 32190 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.

State v. Allan J. Salinas
factor, Salinas claims that “Hooper did not knowingly and voluntarily waive her right to remain silent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17940 - 2005-04-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is not now claiming otherwise. See State v. Moederndorfer, 141 Wis. 2d 823, 827-28, 416 N.W.2d 627 (Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017896 - 2025-10-01

COURT OF APPEALS
jail time and no contact with the victim of this assault, and two other women who claimed that Heibing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30481 - 2007-10-09

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 25, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
a claim or because he is improperly attempting to relitigate a conviction that he has already challenged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27912 - 2007-01-24

COURT OF APPEALS
guidelines for his crime. Robert presented all of his claims in the context of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47143 - 2005-03-31

Amerco Real Estate Company v. 525 Properties Limited Partnership
of Illinois, Inc., and Schneiders-Vetter Glass Company, Inc. (collectively “525”). Amerco claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12681 - 2005-03-31

State v. Casey M. Fisher
erroneously rejected his ineffective assistance of counsel claim without holding an evidentiary hearing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10683 - 2005-03-31

State v. Keith A. Brouwer
his judgment of conviction of operating a vehicle while intoxicated, third offense. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19952 - 2005-10-18

CA Blank Order
, Reed’s trial counsel acknowledged that he could not claim prejudice by the amendment. Reed’s theory
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91196 - 2014-04-29

COURT OF APPEALS
pleading requirements on creditors and the statute does not give rise to an affirmative claim or defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93300 - 2013-02-27